INFORMATION CHANGE THE WORLD

International Journal of Education and Management Engineering(IJEME)

ISSN: 2305-3623 (Print), ISSN: 2305-8463 (Online)

Published By: MECS Press

IJEME Vol.6, No.5, Sep. 2016

Regression Test Suite Prioritization using Residual Test Coverage Algorithm and Statistical Techniques

Full Text (PDF, 472KB), PP.32-39


Views:96   Downloads:1

Author(s)

Abhinandan H. Patil, Neena Goveas, Krishnan Rangarajan

Index Terms

Residual Test Coverage Algorithm;CodeCover;Test Execution Time;Statistical Techniques

Abstract

Regression test suite study has been research topic for decades. In this paper we investigate the Regression test suite prioritization using residual test coverage algorithm for white box testing and introduce new statistical technique for black box testing. Our contribution in this paper is mainly problem solution to breaking the tie in residual coverage algorithm. Further we introduce new metric which can be used for prioritizing the regression test suite for black box testing. Towards the end part of the paper we get down to implementation details explaining how this can be done in the industrial or research project. The intended readers of this paper are developers and testers in the research field and practitioners of software engineering in the large scale industrial projects.

Cite This Paper

Abhinandan H. Patil, Neena Goveas, Krishnan Rangarajan,"Regression Test Suite Prioritization using Residual Test Coverage Algorithm and Statistical Techniques", International Journal of Education and Management Engineering(IJEME), Vol.6, No.5, pp.32-39, 2016.DOI: 10.5815/ijeme.2016.05.04

Reference

[1]Aditya P. Mathur. 2013. Foundations of software testing, 2nd edition text book. University of Purdue. 

[2]Paul C.Jorgensen.2013.Software testing a craftman's approach, 3rd edition, text book.

[3]Abhinandan H. Patil et al.2013. CodeCover: A Code Coverage Tool for Java Projects, ERCICA Elsevier publications.

[4]Abhinandan H. Patil et al.2014.CodeCover: Enhancement of CodeCover, ACM SIGSOFT SEN, March 2014 issue. 

[5]Abhinandan H. Patil, Neena Goveas and Krishnan Rangarajan.2015. Test Suite Design Methodology using Combinatorial Approach for Internet of Things Operating Systems, Scientific Research Publishing, Journal of Software Engineering and Application.

[6]Abhinandan H. Patil, Neena Goveas and Krishnan Rangarajan.2015. Re-architecture of Contiki and Cooja Regression Test Suites using Combinatorial Testing Approach, ACM SIGSOFT SEN, June 2015 issue.

[7]Abhinandan H. Patil, Preeti Satish, Neena Goveas and Krishnan Rangarajan.2015. Integrated Test Environment for Combinatorial Testing. IEEE conferences, IACC. 

[8]CodeCover Home Page=http://codecover.org/.

[9]S. Elbaum, A. G. Malishevsky and G. Rothermel. Test case prioritization: A family of empirical studies. IEEE Trans.

[10]M. J. Harrold, J. A. Jones, T. Li, D. Liang, A. Orso, M. Pennings, S. Sinha, S. A. Spoon and A. Gujarathi. Regression test selection for java software. In OOPSLA '01: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 312–326, New York, NY, USA, ACM Press 2001.

[11]J. A. Jones and M. J. Harrold. Test-suite reduction and prioritization for modified condition/decision coverage. IEEE Trans.Softw. Eng. 2003.

[12]M. Lyu, J. Horgan and S. London. A coverage analysis tool for the effectiveness of software testing. IEEE Trans. on Reliability 1994.

[13]G. Rothermel, M. J. Harrold, J. Ostrin and C. Hong. An empirical study of the effects of minimization on the fault detection capabilities of test suites. In ICSM '98: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, Washington, DC, USA, IEEE Computer Society, 1998.

[14]A. Srivastava and J. Thiagarajan. Effectively prioritizing tests in development environment. In ISSTA '02: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pages 97–106, New York, NY, USA, ACM Press, 2002.

[15]T.W.Williams and M. R.Mercer. Code Coverage, what does it mean in terms of quality. IEEE Conference Publications 2001.

[16]K. Sakamoto and H.Washizaki. Open Code Coverage Framework: A Consistent and Flexible Framework for Measuring Test Coverage Supporting Multiple Programming Languages. IEEE Conference Publications 2010.

[17]Y. Adler and N. Behar. Code Coverage Analysis in Practice for Large Systems. IEEE Conference Publications 2011.

[18]F. Del Frate and P. Grag. On the correlation between code coverage and software reliability. IEEE Conference Publications 1995.

[19]S. Berner and R. Weber. Enhancing Software Testing by Judicious Use of Code Coverage Information. IEEE Conference Publications 2007.

[20]J. Lawrence and S. Clarke. How well do professional developers test with code coverage visualizations? An empirical study. IEEE Conference Publications.

[21]W. E. Wong and Yu Qi. Effective Fault Localization using Code Coverage. IEEE Conference Publications 2007.

[22]R. M. Karcich and R. Skibbe. On software reliability and code coverage. IEEE Conference Publications 1996.

[23]Zheng Li, Mark Harman and Robert M. Hierons.2007. Search Algorithms for Regression Test Case Prioritization, IEEE transactions on Software Engineering.

[24]Siavash Mirarab, Soroush Akhlaglv and Ladan Tahvildari.2012. Size Constrained Regression Test Case Selection using Multicriteria Optmization, IEEE transactions on Software Engineering.

[25]Luay Tahat, Bogdan Korel, Mark Harman and Hasan Ural.2011.Regression Test Suite Prioritization using System Models. Wiley online Library.