INFORMATION CHANGE THE WORLD

International Journal of Education and Management Engineering(IJEME)

ISSN: 2305-3623 (Print), ISSN: 2305-8463 (Online)

Published By: MECS Press

IJEME Vol.7, No.6, Nov. 2017

Image Processing Based Computational Tools for Assisting and Assessing Memorization and Learning Tasks

Full Text (PDF, 937KB), PP.1-13


Views:63   Downloads:0

Author(s)

Mohammad Tanvir Parvez, Sameh Otri

Index Terms

Memorization tools;image processing;computational learning framework

Abstract

In this paper, we present a novel computational framework for assisting and assessing memorization tasks. Such a framework can be used in any cases where certain level of memorization is needed, like in memorizing words/sentences, learning (programming) language structures, etc. We aim to identify the common memorization steps followed in various disciplines and then automate some of these steps to enhance memorization process. Particularly, we focus on annotation of texts (used for memorization) based on state of the art image processing techniques. Once texts are annotated and optionally commented, personalized tests can be automatically generated, focusing on the weakness of a particular student. These tests can further enhance the memorization process. As a case study, we have implemented the framework for a classical example of memorization: memorizing the Qur’an, the sacred book in Islam. Qur’an memorization is a well-known process since the early days of Islam and represents an ideal case for implementing the proposed framework. 

Cite This Paper

Mohammad Tanvir Parvez, Sameh Otri,"Image Processing Based Computational Tools for Assisting and Assessing Memorization and Learning Tasks", International Journal of Education and Management Engineering(IJEME), Vol.7, No.6, pp.1-13, 2017.DOI: 10.5815/ijeme.2017.06.01

Reference

[1]Biggs, J. (1996). Western misperceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In D. Watkins, & J. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological, and contextual influences, Hong Kong: CERC & ACER, pp. 45-67.

[2]Boyle, H. N. (2006). Memorization and learning in Islamic schools. Comparative Education Review, 50(3), pp. 478-495.

[3]Cortazzi, M; Jin, L. (1996) Cultures of Learning: Language Classrooms in China in H. Coleman (ed.) Society and the Language Classroom, Cambridge: CUP, pp.169–206.

[4]Download Quran Text, http://tanzil.net/download (accessed 12/7/2016).

[5]Elobaid M, Hameed K, Yahia Eldow ME. (2014) Toward designing and modeling of Quran learning applications for android devices. Life Sci J. 11(1), pp. 160–171.

[6]Little, J. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2015). Individual differences in category learning: Memorization versus rule abstraction. Memory & cognition, 43(2), 283-297.

[7]King Fahd Glorious Quran Printing Complex, http://www.qurancomplex.org/ (accessed 12/5/2016).

[8]Park, C. C. (2000). Learning style preferences of Southeast Asian students. Urban Education.35(3), 245-268.

[9]Parvez, M. T., & Mahmoud, S. A. (2013). Arabic handwriting recognition using structural and syntactic pattern attributes. Pattern Recognition, 46(1), 141-154.

[10]Parvez, M. T., & Mahmoud, S. A. (2013). Offline Arabic handwritten text recognition: a survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 45(2), 23.

[11]Petersson, H., Sinkvist, D., Wang, C., & Smedby, Ö. (2009). Web‐based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning. Anatomical sciences education, 2(2), 61-68.

[12]Raiyn, Jamal. (2016). Developing a Mathematics Lesson Plan based on Visual Learning Technology, I.J. Education and Management Engineering, 4, pp. 1-9.

[13]Rashidi, N., & Omid, A. (2011). A survey on Iranian EFL learners' beliefs on the role of rote memorization in learning vocabulary and its effect on vocabulary achievement. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), pp. 139-161.

[14]Salili, F. (1996). Accepting personal responsibility for learning. In D. Watkins, & J. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological, and contextual influences. Hong Kong: CERC & ACER. pp. 85-105.

[15]Smith, D. R. (2008). Learning style preference, sense of classroom community, gender, age, and previous experience within computer-mediated instruction (CMI). The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

[16]Shamsuddin, S. N. W., Bakar, N. F. A., Makhtar, M., Isa, W. M. W., Rozaimee, A., & Yusof, N. (2016). A Framework for Designing Mobile Quranic Memorization Tool Using Multimedia Interactive Learning Method for Children. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 92(1), 20.

[17]Soloso L, R. (1988). Cognitive Psychology. USA: Allyn and Bacon Inc.

[18]Yusef, M., (2010), Memorization as a learning style: A balance approach to academic excellence, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(6), 49 -58.