[1]Hajovsky, D. B., Villeneuve, E. F., Reynolds, M. R., Niileksela, C. R., Mason, B. A., & Shudak, N. J. (2018). Cognitive ability influences on written expression: Evidence for developmental and sex-based differences in school-age children. Journal of School Psychology, 67, 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.09.001
[2]Weiner, B. J., Lewis, C. C., Stanick, C., Powell, B. J., Dorsey, C. N., Clary, A., Boynton, M. H., & Halko, H. M. (2017). Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Science, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3
[3]York, T., Gibson, C., & Rankin, S. (2015). Defining and measuring academic success. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 20(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.7275/hz5x-tx03
[4]Axelrod, V., Rees, G., & Bar, M. (2017). The default network and the combination of cognitive processes that mediate self-generated thought. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(12), 896–910. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0244-9
[5]Fabiano‐Smith, L. (2019). Standardized tests and the diagnosis of speech sound disorders. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 4(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_pers-sig1-2018-0018
[6]Irwing, P., Booth, T., & Hughes, D. J. (2018). The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Testing: A Multidisciplinary Reference on Survey, Scale and Test Development. John Wiley & Sons.
[7]De Stasio, S., Fiorilli, C., & Di Chiacchio, C. (2014). Effects of verbal ability and fluid intelligence on children’s emotion understanding. International Journal of Psychology, 49(5), 409–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12032
[8]Cappelleri, J. C., Lundy, J. J., & Hays, R. D. (2014). Overview of Classical test Theory and item response Theory for the quantitative assessment of items in developing Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures. Clinical Therapeutics, 36(5), 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.04.006
[9]Alzayat, F., Almahrazi, R., Arshad, A., Fathi, K., Albaili, M., dogan, A., Asiri, A., Hadi, F., & Jassim, A. (2011). Technical report of the Gulf Scale for Multiple Mental Abilities (GMMAS). Arab Gulf University, Bahrain.
[10]Forkmann, T., Boecker, M., Norra, C., Eberle, N., Kircher, T., Schauerte, P., Mischke, K., Westhofen, M., Gauggel, S., & Wirtz, M. (2009). Development of an item bank for the assessment of depression in persons with mental illnesses and physical diseases using Rasch analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54(2), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015612
[11]Brodke, D. J., Saltzman, C. L., & Brodke, D. S. (2016). PROMIS for orthopaedic Outcomes measurement. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 24(11), 744–749. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-15-00404
[12]Sedoc, J., & Ungar, L (2020). Item Response Theory for Efficient Human Evaluation of Chatbots. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Evaluation and Comparison of NLP Systems, 21–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/ 2020.eval4nlp-1.3.
[13]Young‐Afat, D. A., Gibbons, C., Klassen, A. F., Vickers, A., Cano, S., & Pusic, A. L. (2019). Introducing BREAST-Q Computerized Adaptive Testing: Short and Individualized Patient-Reported Outcome Assessment following Reconstructive Breast Surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 143(3), 679–684. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000005314
[14]Choi, Y., & McClenen, C. (2020). Development of adaptive formative assessment system using computerized adaptive testing and dynamic Bayesian networks. Applied Sciences, 10(22), 8196. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228196
[15]Falani, I., Akbar, M. and Naga, D. S. (2020). The precision of students’ ability estimation on combinations of item response theory models. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 545–558. pp. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13434a
[16]Morris, S. B., Bass, M., Howard, E. V., & Neapolitan, R. E. (2019). Stopping rules for computer adaptive testing when item banks have nonuniform information. International Journal of Testing, 20(2), 146–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2019.1635604
[17]Ghosh, A., & Lan, A. S. (2021). BOBCAT: Bilevel Optimization-Based Computerized Adaptive Testing. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/332
[18]Magis, D & Barrada, J. R. (2017). Computerized adaptive testing with R: recent updates of the package catR. Journal of statistical software, 76. https://doi :10.18637/jss.v076.c01
[19]Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Setiawan, R., & Megawati, I. (2020). Developing of Computerized Adaptive Testing to Measure Physics Higher Order Thinking Skills of Senior High School Students and its Feasibility of Use. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.91
[20]Şahin, A., & Anıl, D. (2017). The effects of test length and sample size on item parameters in item response theory. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17, 321–335. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.1.0270
[21]Crisan, D., Tendeiro, J. N., & Meijer, R. R. (2017). Investigating the practical consequences of model misfit in unidimensional IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(6), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617695522
[22]Meijer, R. R., & Tendeiro, J. N. (2018). Unidimensional item response theory. In P. Irwing, T. Booth, & D. J. Hughes (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of psychometric testing: A multidisciplinary reference on survey, scale and test development (pp. 413–443). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772.ch15
[23]Tian, X., & Dai, B. (2020). Developing a computerized adaptive test to assess stress in Chinese college students. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00007
[24]Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjørner, J. B., et al. (2007). Psychometric Evaluation and Calibration of Health-Related Quality of Life Item Banks. Medical Care, 45(5), S22–S31. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04 [25]Edelen, M. O., and Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Qual. Life Res. 16, 5–18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0
[26]Pelobillo, G. (2023). Conceptions of Learning Physics among University of Mindanao Students: A Validation Study. International Journal of Instruction, 16(4), 921–938. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16451a
[27]Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1985). A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38(2), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00834.x
[28]Wahyudi, A., Richardo, R., Eilks, I., & Kulgemeyer, C. (2023). Development of Three tier Open-Ended Instrument to measure Chemistry students’ critical thinking disposition using RASCH analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16311a
[29]Li, Z., Cai, Y., & Tu, D. (2020). A new approach to assessing shyness of college students using computerized adaptive testing: CAT-Shyness. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 14, e20. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2020.15
[30]Bichi, A., & Talib, R. (2018). Item response theory: An introduction to latent trait models for testing and item development. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 7(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7i2.12900.
[31]Fu, Q. (2010). Comparing Accuracy of parameter Estimation Using IRT Models in The Presence of Guessing [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
[32]Gao, S. (2011). The Exploration of the Relationship Between Guessing and Latent Ability in IRT Models [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Southern Illinois, USA.
[33]Edwards, M. C., Houts, C. R., & Cai, L. (2018). A diagnostic procedure to detect departures from local independence in item response theory models. Psychological methods, 23(1), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000121
[34]Chen, W.-H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22(3), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165285
[35]Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating Scale Analysis. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
[36]Ferrando, P. J., Vigil-Colet, A., & Lorenzo‐Seva, U. (2016). Practical Person-Fit Assessment with the Linear FA Model: New Developments and a Comparative Study. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01973
[37]Almehrizi, R. S. (2010). Comparing among new residual-fit and wright’s Indices for dichotomous three -Parameter IRT model with standardized tests. Journal of Educational & Psychological Studies, 4 (2), 14-26.
[38]Almaskari, H. A., Almehrizi, R. S., & Hassan, A. S. (2021). Differential item Functioning of Verbal Ability Test in Gulf Multiple Mental Ability Scale for GCC students according to gender and country. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies, 15(1), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.53543/jeps.vol15iss1pp120-137
[39]Geramipour, M. (2020). Item-focused trees approach in differential item functioning (DIF) analysis: A case study of an EFL reading comprehension test. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 7(2),123-147 https://doi: 10.30479/jmrels.2019.11061.1379 
[40]Magis, D., & Raiche, G. (2012). Random generation of response patterns under computerized adaptive testing with the R package catR. Journal of statistical software, 48(8), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i08
[41]Mahmud, J., Sutikno, M., & Naga, D. S. (2016). Variance difference between maximum likelihood estimation method and expected a posteriori estimation method viewed from number of test items. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(16), 1579-1589. https://doi: 10.5897/ERR2016.2807
[42]Sorrel, M. A., Barrada, J. R., De La Torre, J., & Abad, F. (2020). Adapting cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing item selection rules to traditional item response theory. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0227196. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227196
[43]Omara, E.,  Kazem, A. (2020). A feasibility study for developing a computerized adaptive form of Raven’s colored progressive matrices test for Omani children based on the item response theory. The International Journal for Research in Education, 44(3), 142–181. https://doi.org/10.36771/ijre.44.3.20-pp142-181
[44]Brown, A., & Croudace, T. (2015). Scoring and estimating score precision using multidimensional IRT. In S. P. Reise & D. A. Revicki (Eds.), Handbook of Item Response Theory Modeling: Applications to Typical Performance Assessment (pp. 307- 333). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
[45]Seo, D. G., & Jung, S. (2018). A comparison of three empirical reliability estimates for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) using a medical licensing examination. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00681
[46]Smits, N., Cuijpers, P., & Van Straten, A. (2011). Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: A simulation study. Psychiatry Research, 188(1), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2010.12.001
[47]Kraemer, H. C., & Kupfer, D. J. (2006). Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice. Biological Psychiatry, 59(11), 990–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.09.014
[48]Atchia, S. M. C., & Chinapah, V. (2023). Factors influencing the academic achievement of secondary school students: A Structural equation model. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 999–1020. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16155a
[49]May, S., Littlewood, C., and Bishop, A. (2006). Reliability of procedures used in the physical examination of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review. Austr. J. Physiother. 52, 91–102. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(06)70044-7
[50]Liu, O. L. (2011). Do major field of study and cultural familiarity affect TOEFL® IBT reading performance? A confirmatory approach to differential item functioning. Applied Measurement in Education, 24(3), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2011.580645
[51]Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Wainer, H. (1988). Use of item response theory in the study of group differences in trace lines. In H. Wainer & H. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (Pps. 147–169). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[52]Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
[53]Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
[54]Kocalevent, R.-D., Rose, M., Becker, J., Walter, O. B., Fliege, H., Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2009). An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 62, 278–287.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.03.003