International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business (IJIEEB)
IJIEEB Vol. 16, No. 1, 8 Feb. 2024
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 325KB)
The Philosophy of Smart Learning Using the Approach Thomas Kuhn Paradigm Shift
Full Text (PDF, 325KB), PP.54-62
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Author(s)
Azizah. Zakiah
1,*
Ary Setijadi Prihatmanto
1
Dimitri Mahayana
1
Reza Andrea
2
Index Terms
Smart learning, Smart education, Education 21, Philosophy, Kuhn
Abstract
The impact of technology must be addressed by the educational methods themselves and their perspectives in the new paradigm of citizenship in this intelligent environment. Learning environments have changed dramatically in the last 50 years, in large part due to information and communications technologies. The study uses a qualitative descriptive. Thomas S. Kuhn, fully Thomas Samuel Kuhn, (born 18 July 1922 in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA-17 June 1996 in Cambridge, Massachusetts), best known for The Structure of the Scientific. Kuhn explains that in every scientific discipline, there are some identified and natural phenomena that are then investigated experimentally and explained theoretically. Pre-paradigm as the basis of normal science, the formation of smart learning is started when primitive cave. Normal science for learning is a traditional teaching method, teaching takes place within the four walls of a classroom. Anomalies are surprising discoveries that cannot be defined through a paradigm, together with discoveries of troubles that cannot be solved through a paradigm. The lock down following the COVID-19 pandemic has made us extrude in a single day from mastering withinside the bodily international to mastering withinside the virtual one. Model crises are the third phase of the Kuhn cycle. Triggering the Model Crisis movement Blended learning can be the brand new normal – “Blended learning”. The smart learning cognizance and traits has emerged as a brand-new fashion withinside the international academic field. different smart technologies, consisting of cloud computing, learning analytics, huge information, Internet of things (IoT) and wearable generation.
Cite This Paper
Azizah Zakiah, Ary Setijadi Prihatmanto, Dimitri Mahayana, Reza Andrea, "The Philosophy of Smart Learning Using the Approach Thomas Kuhn Paradigm Shift ", International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business(IJIEEB), Vol.16, No.1, pp. 54-62, 2024. DOI:10.5815/ijieeb.2024.01.05
Reference
[1]J. Weinberg, “Why Science Education Needs Philosophy,” Daily Nous, Nov. 14, 2017. https://dailynous.com/2017/11/14/science-education-needs-philosophy/ (accessed Nov. 02, 2022).
[2]J. Teira-Lafuente, A. B. Gil-González, and A. de Luis Reboredo, “Philosophical Approaches to Smart Education and Smart Cities,” in Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 10th International Conference, Cham, 2020, pp. 239–248. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-52538-5_24.
[3]J. M. Spector, “Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 2, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1186/s40561-014-0002-7.
[4]“Thomas S. Kuhn,” University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/author/K/T/au5252573.html (accessed Nov. 24, 2022).
[5]“Thomas S. Kuhn | American philosopher and historian | Britannica.” https://www.britannica.com/biography/Thomas-S-Kuhn (accessed Nov. 03, 2022).
[6]T. FIRINCI ORMAN, “" Paradigm " as a Central Concept in Thomas Kuhn’s Thought,” International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 6, Nov. 2016.
[7]“Thomas Kuhn on Paradigms - Anand - 2020 - Production and Operations Management - Wiley Online Library.” https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/poms.13188 (accessed Nov. 24, 2022).
[8]“Definition of Ontology | What is an Ontology | Encyclopedia of Database Systems,” Tom Gruber. https://tomgruber.org/writing/definition-of-ontology (accessed Nov. 02, 2022).
[9]X. Chen, D. Zou, H. Xie, and F. L. Wang, “Past, present, and future of smart learning: a topic-based bibliometric analysis,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 2, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00239-6.
[10]L. Șchiopu, “PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION AND AXIOLOGY,” p. 56.
[11]T. Hartung and A. M. Tsatsakis, “The state of the scientific revolution in toxicology,” ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, vol. 38, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.14573/altex.2106101.
[12]“Pre Paradigmatic Science Analysis Philosophy Essay.” https://www.ukessays.com/essays/philosophy/pre-paradigmatic-science-analysis-philosophy-essay.php (accessed Nov. 06, 2022).
[13]“Cohort 7’s History of Educational Technology timeline.,” Timetoast timelines. https://www.timetoast.com/timelines/fall-2020-cohort-7 (accessed Nov. 05, 2022).
[14]“What is the traditional method of teaching? – Graphy.” https://graphy.com/blog/traditional-method-of-teaching/ (accessed Nov. 08, 2022).
[15]“Constructivism.” https://www.buffalo.edu/catt/develop/theory/constructivism.html (accessed Nov. 16, 2022).
[16]S. M. Ismail, D. R. Rahul, I. Patra, and E. Rezvani, “Formative vs. summative assessment: impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill,” Lang Test Asia, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 40, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4.
[17]X. Chen, D. Zou, H. Xie, and F. L. Wang, “Past, present, and future of smart learning: a topic-based bibliometric analysis,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 2, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00239-6.
[18]V. Ahmed and A. Opoku, “Technology supported learning and pedagogy in times of crisis: the case of COVID-19 pandemic,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 365–405, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10706-w.
[19]“5 Learning & Development Trends In the Post-Pandemic World.” https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/5-learning-development-trends-post-pandemic-world-matchy-ma (accessed Nov. 07, 2022).
[20]Y.-H. Hu, “Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the online learning behaviors of university students in Taiwan,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 469–491, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10677-y.
[21]“The Model Revolution Step of the (Thomas) Kuhn Cycle.” https://www.thwink.org/sustain/glossary/ModelRevolution.htm (accessed Nov. 06, 2022).
[22]P. A. García-Tudela, P. Prendes-Espinosa, and I. M. Solano-Fernández, “Smart learning environments: a basic research towards the definition of a practical model,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 9, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40561-021-00155-w.
[23]D. Turnbull, R. Chugh, and J. Luck, “Learning Management Systems, An Overview,” Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies, pp. 1052–1058, 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_248.
[24]M. L. Betasolo, “Culture – Educational Paradigm Shift Learning Methodologies Derived from Axiomatic Design Principle,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 53, pp. 179–186, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.08.035.
[25]“CREATION OF AUTOMATED CONTENT WITH EMBEDDED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A STUDY ON LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR EDUCATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP - ProQuest.” https://www.proquest.com/openview/03fefb391067ddf46d9d5681b80f9ea6/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=29726 (accessed Nov. 24, 2022).
[26]Z.-T. Zhu, M.-H. Yu, and P. Riezebos, “A research framework of smart education,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 4, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2.