International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business(IJIEEB)
ISSN: 2074-9023 (Print), ISSN: 2074-9031 (Online)
Published By: MECS Press
IJIEEB Vol.5, No.4, Oct. 2013
Instructor’s Performance:A Proposed Model for Online Evaluation
Full Text (PDF, 482KB), PP.34-40
Currently due to high awareness and quality audits, the higher education institutions have made to keep a track on various performances of the institutions. One such most important activity that has to be analyzed and evaluated is Instructor’s classroom performance. As the students are the main stakeholders of the educational process, their concerns over the instructor, teaching pedagogies and methodologies, assessment techniques need to be collected and analyzed for achieving the institution’s goals and objectives. The students shall give their opinions related to the various performance indicators of instructor.In general, the higher education institutions use various techniques to evaluate instructor’s performance in the classroom from the students. The latest technological developments help in data collection using web technologies. Online system with required questionnaire and attributes will help the higher education institutions in easy data collection. Apart from that the students shall give their opinions without any fear from any place and at any time. In this paper, we have identified the major factors and users of an instructor online evaluation system. Also, we have proposed a model for such system with subsystem interface, entity relationship diagram and context diagram.
Cite This Paper
Salah Alkhafaji, B. Sriram,"Instructor’s Performance:A Proposed Model for Online Evaluation", IJIEEB, vol.5, no.4, pp.34-40, 2013. DOI: 10.5815/ijieeb.2013.04.05
Zhang Zhiyu, Yan Xiujian, Li Li ; Wu Baogui – Research on a General Teachers Evaluation Management System – Information Technology and Applications Vol 3; pp: 80 – 83, doi: 10.1109/IFITA.2010.179.
McFall, R., Urban-Lurain, M. Weinshank, D., "A Web-to-database system for collecting student data," Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual, vol.2, no., pp.F1E-14,F1E-18, (2), 2002; doi: 10.1109/FIE.2002.1206464.
Meyer, D.G., "A criteria-based course and instructor evaluation system: recent experiences in development and utilization," Frontiers in Education Conference, 1997. 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change. Proceedings, vol.1, 5-8 Nov 1997; doi: 10.1109/FIE.1997.644839.
Emery, C.R., Kramer, T.R., Tian, R.G (2003) – Return to Academic Standards: A Critique Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness – Quality Assurance in Education – 11(1), pp: 37 – 46.
Michael Theall, Jennifer Franklin (2001) – Looking for Bias in the all Wrong Places: A Search for Truth or a Witch Hunt in Student Ratings of Instruction? – New Directions for Institutional Research – No 109; pp: 45 -56.
Dommeyer, C.J., Baum, P., Hanna, R.W., Chapman, K.S (2004) – Gathering Faculty Teaching Evaluations by in-class and online Surveys: Their Effects and Response rate and Evaluations – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education – 29(5): Carfax Publishing.
Glotzbach, R., Burton, T., Co, B., Middleton, R. &Stremke, R. (2007). A Web – Based Application for Online Instructor Evaluations. In R. Carlsen et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 62-65). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/24502.
Stuart Russell, Peter Norvig – Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach – 2e – (2009) – Prentice Hall
Alan Dix, Janet Finlay, Gregory D. Abowed, Russell Beale – Human Computer Interaction – 3e – (2008) - Pearson Education.
Sommerville – Software Engineering – 8e – (2009) – Pearson Education.
Waman, Jawadekar, S., – Software Engineering Principles and Practice – 12th Reprint – (2010) - Tata McGraw – Hill.
Peters, J. S., PedryczWitold – Software Engineering: An Engineering Approach – (2010) - Wiley India Pvt Ltd.