IJISA Vol. 12, No. 4, 8 Aug. 2020
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 681KB)
Full Text (PDF, 681KB), PP.13-24
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Fuzzy sets, fuzzy numbers, ranking of fuzzy numbers, defuzzification
The importance of fuzzy numbers to express uncertainty in certain applications, concerned with decision making, is observed in a large number of problems of different kinds. In Decision making problems, the best of available alternatives is chosen to the possible extent. In the process of ordering the alternatives, ranking of fuzzy numbers plays a key role. A large volume of ranking methods, based on different features, have been available in this domain. Owing to the complicated nature of fuzzy numbers, the so far introduced methods suffered setbacks or posed difficulties or showed drawbacks in one context or other. In addition, some methods are lengthy and complicated to apply on concerned problems. In this article, a new ranking procedure based on defuzzification, stemmed from the concepts of geometric mean and height of a fuzzy number, is proposed. Finally, numerical comparisons are made with other existing procedures for testing and validation of proposed method with the support of some standard numerical examples.
Nalla Veerraju, V Lakshmi Prasannam, L N P Kumar Rallabandi, "Defuzzification Index for Ranking of Fuzzy Numbers on the Basis of Geometric Mean", International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications(IJISA), Vol.12, No.4, pp.13-24, 2020. DOI:10.5815/ijisa.2020.04.02
[1]Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 1965, 8:338–353.
[2]Jain R. Decision making in the presence of fuzzy variable. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetic, 1976, 6:698-703.
[3]Jain R. A procedure for multi-aspect decision making using fuzzy sets. International Journal of Systems Science, 1977, 8:1-7.
[4]Bass S, Kwakernaak H. Rating and ranking of multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets, Automatica, 1977, 13: 47-58.
[5]Dubios D, Prade H. Operations on fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Systems Science, 1978, 9:613-626.
[6]Yager R R. Ranking fuzzy subsets over the unit interval. IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 17th Symposium on Adaptive Processes, 1978, 1435–1437.
[7]Yager R . A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval. Information Sciences, 1981, 24:143-161.
[8]Chen S. Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1985, 17:113-129.
[9]Choobineh F, Li H. An index for ordering fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1993, 54: 287-294.
[10]Fortemps P, Roubens M. Ranking and defuzzification methods based on area compensation. Fuzzy sets and systems, 1996, 82: 319-330.
[11]Cheng C H. A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1998, 95:307-317.
[12]Yao J, Wu K. Ranking fuzzy numbers based on decomposition principle and signed distance. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 116:275-288.
[13]Chu T, Tsao C. Ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid point and original point. Computational Mathematics with Applications, 2002, 43:111-117.
[14]Abbasbandy S, Asady B. Ranking of fuzzy numbers by sign distance. Information Sciences, 2006, 176:2405-2416.
[15]Wang Y M, Yang J B, Xu D L, Chin K S. On the centroids of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Systems, 2006, 157 (7):919–926.
[16]Asady B, Zendehnam A. Ranking fuzzy numbers by distance minimization. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2007, 31:2589-2598.
[17]Chen S M, Chen J H. Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers with different heights and different spreads. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36 (3):6833–6842.
[18]Abbasbandy S, Hajjari T. A new approach for ranking of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Computer and Mathematics with Applications, 2009, 57: 413 – 419.
[19]Asady B. Revision of distance minimization method for ranking of fuzzy numbers. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011, 35:1306-1313.
[20]Allahviranloo T, Abbasbandy S, Saneifard R. A method for ranking of fuzzy numbers using new weighted distance. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 2011, 16(2):359-369.
[21]Chen S M, Sanguansat K. Analyzing fuzzy risk based on a new fuzzy ranking method between generalized fuzzy numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38 (3):2163–2171.
[22]Chen S M, Munif A, Chen G S, Liu H C, Kuo B C. Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers with different left heights and right heights. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39 (7):6320–6334.
[23]Allahviranloo R, Saneifard T. Defuzzification method for ranking fuzzy numbers based on center of gravity. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy systems, 2012, 9(6):57-67.
[24]Nasseri S H, Zadeh M M, Kardoost M, Behmanesh E. Ranking fuzzy quantities based on the angle of the reference functions. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(22):9230–9241.
[25]Rezvani S. Ranking generalized exponential trapezoidal fuzzy numbers based on variance. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2015, 262: 191–198.
[26]Chutia R, Chutia B. A new method of ranking parametric form of fuzzy numbers using value and ambiguity. Applied Soft Computing, 2017, 52:1154 –1168.
[27]Chutia R. Ranking of fuzzy numbers by using value and angle in epsilon - deviation degree method. Applied Soft Computing, 2017, 60: 706–721.
[28]Bortolan G, Degani R. A review of some methods for ranking fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1985, 15:1-19.
[29]Wang X, Kerre E E. Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities (i). Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2001, 118(3): 375–385.
[30]Brunelli M, Mezei J. How different are ranking methods for fuzzy numbers? A numerical study. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2013, 54 (5):627–639.
[31]Baldwin J F, Guild N C F. Comparison of fuzzy numbers on the same decision space. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1979, 2:213-233.
[32]Shureshjani R A, Darehmiraki M. A new parametric method for ranking fuzzy numbers. Indagationes Mathematicae, 2013, 24:518-529.