IJISA Vol. 5, No. 6, 8 May 2013
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 511KB)
Full Text (PDF, 511KB), PP.61-69
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
UWSNs, Fitness, Holding Time, Heuristic Function
Underwater sensor network is one of the potential research arenas that opens the window of pleasing a lot of researcher in studying the field. Network layer of the underwater sensor networks must be one of the most attractive fields to build up anew protocol. In this paper, we proposed a underwater sensor network routing protocol named Energy Efficient Fitness based routing protocol for under water sensor networks (EEF) that promises the best use of total energy consumptions. The proposed routing protocol takes into account residual energy, depth and distance from the forwarding node to the sink node to guide a packet from source to the destination node. The prominent advantages of the proposed protocol are to confirm higher network life time and less end to end delay. The proposed protocol does not use control packet that causes much energy consumption and end to end delay. Simulation has been performed to certify the better result of the proposed routing protocol.
Md. Ashrafuddin, Md. Manowarul Islam, Md. Mamun-or-Rashid, "Energy Efficient Fitness Based Routing Protocol for Underwater Sensor Network", International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications(IJISA), vol.5, no.6, pp.61-69, 2013. DOI:10.5815/ijisa.2013.06.08
[1]F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia. Challenges for efficient communication in underwater acoustic sensor networks. ACM Sigbed Review, 1(2):3–8, 2004.
[2]J. Heidemann, Y. Li, A. Syed, J. Wills, and W. Ye. Underwater sensor networking: Research challenges and potential applications. USC/ISI Technical Report ISI-TR-2005-603, 2005.
[3]J.A. Rice. Undersea networked acoustic communication and navigation for autonomous mine countermeasure systems. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Technology and the Mine Problem, 2002.
[4]L. Guo, P.H. Santschi, M. Baskaran, and A. Zindler. Distribution of dissolved and particulate in seawater from the gulf of mexico and off cape hatteras as measured by sims. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 133(1):117–128, 1995.
[5]P. Xie, J.H. Cui, and L. Lao. Vbf: vector-based forwarding protocol for underwater sensor networks. Networking 2006. Networking Technologies, Services, and Protocols; Performance of Computer and Communication Networks; Mobile and Wireless Communications Systems, pages 1216–1221, 2006.
[6]N. Nicolaou, A. See, P. Xie, J.H. Cui, and D. Maggiorini. Improving the robustness of location-based routing for underwater sensor networks. In OCEANS 2007-Europe, pages 1–6. IEEE, 2007.
[7]J. Heidemann, Y. Li, A. Syed, J. Wills, and W. Ye. Underwater sensor networking: Research challenges and potential applications. USC/ISI Technical Report ISI-TR-2005-603, 2005.
[8]M.C. Domingo and R. Prior. Design and analysis of a gps-free routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks in deep water. In Sensor Technologies and Applications, 2007. SensorComm 2007. International Conference on, pages 215–220. IEEE, 2007.
[9]M. Ayaz and A. Abdullah. Hop-by-hop dynamic addressing based (H2-DAB) routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks, In proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Multimedia Technology (ICIMT 2009), pages 436–441. Jeju Island, Korea, 2009.
[10]Z. Zhou and J.-H. Cui. Energy efficient multi-path communication for time-critical applications in underwater sensor networks. in 9th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc 2008), 2008:221–230, 2008.
[11]H. Yan, Z. Shi, and J.H. Cui. Dbr: depth-based routing for underwater sensor networks. NETWORKING 2008 Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks, Wireless Networks, Next Generation Internet, pages 72–86, 2008.
[12]W. K. Seach and H. X. Tan. Multipath virtual sink architecture for underwater sensor networks. OCEANS, May 2006.
[13]The Network Simulator NS-2. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/doc/index.html, 2002.