Comparative Study between ARX and ARMAX System Identification

Full Text (PDF, 671KB), PP.25-34

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Farzin Piltan 1,* Shahnaz TayebiHaghighi 1 Nasri B. Sulaiman 2

1. Intelligent Systems and Robotics Lab, Iranian Institute of Advanced Science and Technology (IRAN SSP), Shiraz/Iran

2. Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijisa.2017.02.04

Received: 1 May 2016 / Revised: 11 Aug. 2016 / Accepted: 6 Oct. 2016 / Published: 8 Feb. 2017

Index Terms

System identification, highly nonlinear dynamic equations, Arx system identification algorithm, Armax system identification algorithm

Abstract

System Identification is used to build mathematical models of a dynamic system based on measured data. To design the best controllers for linear or nonlinear systems, mathematical modeling is the main challenge. To solve this challenge conventional and intelligent identification are recommended. System identification is divided into different algorithms. In this research, two important types algorithm are compared to identifying the highly nonlinear systems, namely: Auto-Regressive with eXternal model input (ARX) and Auto Regressive moving Average with eXternal model input (Armax) Theory. These two methods are applied to the highly nonlinear industrial motor.

Cite This Paper

Farzin Piltan, Shahnaz TayebiHaghighi, Nasri B. Sulaiman,"Comparative Study between ARX and ARMAX System Identification", International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications(IJISA), Vol.9, No.2, pp.25-34, 2017. DOI:10.5815/ijisa.2017.02.04

Reference

[1]Jami‘in, M. A., Hu, J., Marhaban, M. H., Sutrisno, I., & Mariun, N. B. (2016). Quasi‐ARX neural network based adaptive predictive control for nonlinear systems. IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 11(1), 83-90.
[2]Sar, A., & Kural, A. (2015, November). Modeling and ARX identification of a quadrotor MiniUAV. In 2015 9th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ELECO) (pp. 1196-1200). IEEE.
[3]Hartmann, A., Lemos, J. M., Costa, R. S., Xavier, J., & Vinga, S. (2015). Identification of switched ARX models via convex optimization and expectation maximization. Journal of Process Control, 28, 9-16.
[4]Rincón, F. D., Le Roux, G. A., & Lima, F. V. (2015). A novel ARX-based approach for the steady-state identification analysis of industrial depropanizer column datasets. Processes, 3(2), 257-285.
[5]Folgheraiter, M. (2016). A combined B-spline-neural-network and ARX model for online identification of nonlinear dynamic actuation systems. Neurocomputing, 175, 433-442.
[6]Ahmad A. Mahfouz, Mohammed M. K., Farhan A. Salem,"Modeling, Simulation and Dynamics Analysis Issues of Electric Motor, for Mechatronics Applications, Using Different Approaches and Verification by MATLAB/Simulink", International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications(IJISA), Vol.5, No.5, pp.39-57, 2013.DOI: 10.5815/ijisa.2013.05.06.
[7]Santosh Kumar Nanda, Debi Prasad Tripathy, Simanta Kumar Nayak, Subhasis Mohapatra,"Prediction of Rainfall in India using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Models", International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications(IJISA), Vol.5, No.12, pp.1-22, 2013. DOI: 10.5815/ijisa.2013.12.01.
[8]Nikolay Karabutov,"Structural Identification of Systems with Distributed Lag", International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications (IJISA), Vol.5, No.11, pp.1-10, 2013. DOI: 10.5815/ijisa.2013.11.01.
[9]Dragan Antić, Miroslav Milovanović, Saša Nikolić, Marko Milojković, Staniša Perić,"Simulation Model of Magnetic Levitation Based on NARX Neural Networks", International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications (IJISA), Vol.5, No.5, pp.25-32, 2013.DOI: 10.5815/ijisa.2013.05.04.
[10]Ljung, Lennart. "System identification." Signal Analysis and Prediction. Birkhäuser Boston, 1998. 163-173.
[11]Nelles, Oliver. Nonlinear system identification: from classical approaches to neural networks and fuzzy models. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
[12]Oomen, Tom, et al. "Connecting system identification and robust control for next-generation motion control of a wafer stage." IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 22.1 (2014): 102-118.
[13]Liu, Lezhang, et al. "Integrated system identification and state-of-charge estimation of battery systems." IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion28.1 (2013): 12-23.
[14]Dorobantu, Andrei, et al. "System identification for small, low-cost, fixed-wing unmanned aircraft." Journal of Aircraft 50.4 (2013): 1117-1130.
[15]Fuggini, C., E. Chatzi, and D. Zangani. "Combining Genetic Algorithms with a Meso‐Scale Approach for System Identification of a Smart Polymeric Textile." Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 28.3 (2013): 227-245.