INFORMATION CHANGE THE WORLD

International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security(IJCNIS)

ISSN: 2074-9090 (Print), ISSN: 2074-9104 (Online)

Published By: MECS Press

IJCNIS Vol.10, No.7, Jul. 2018

Performance Evaluation of AODV, DSDV, OLSR Routing Protocols using NS-3 Simulator

Full Text (PDF, 539KB), PP.59-65


Views:50   Downloads:2

Author(s)

Radha Raman Chandan, Bindeshwar Singh Kushwaha, Pramod Kumar Mishra

Index Terms

DSDV;AODV;OLSR;Performance Evaluation;and Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocols

Abstract

Today, Due to mobility wireless network have a heavy demand especially for wireless Ad-Hoc network. In Ad-Hoc network a group of wireless mobile nodes cooperate with each other by routing of packets. So it is necessary to design a wireless network which gives the best performance by suitable protocol selection and path routing. The selection of protocol should be suitable in terms of data integrity as well as data delivery. Hence performance evaluation of protocol is a major issue before selection of a routing protocol. In this paper our aim is to analyse the performance matrices including end to end delay, jitter, packet loss and packet delivery fraction of multi hop network by simulation. Performance evaluation of wireless ad hoc network routing protocols specially Ad-hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV), Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR), Destination Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) have been completed using NS-3 Simulator. After simulation we have found that OLSR routing protocol gives the best result comparison to AODV and DSDV in large and dense network.

Cite This Paper

Radha Raman Chandan, Bindeshwar Singh Kushwaha, Pramod Kumar Mishra,"Performance Evaluation of AODV, DSDV, OLSR Routing Protocols using NS-3 Simulator", International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security(IJCNIS), Vol.10, No.7, pp.59-65, 2018.DOI: 10.5815/ijcnis.2018.07.07

Reference

[1]Charles E. Perkins, Pravin Bhagwat,”Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector Routing for Mobile Computers”, SIGCOMM 1994 ACM pages 234-244.

[2]C. Perkins, E.BeldingRoyer, S.Das, “Ad hoc On- Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing”, Internet RFCs, 2003, pages 1-38

[3]D. Johnson, D. Maltz, J.Broach, ”The Dynamic Source Routing protocol multi hop wireless ad hoc networks”, 2001, pages 1-25.

[4]T. Clausen, P. Jacque, ”Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) Protocol”, IETF RFC3626, 2003

[5]J.Broch, D.Maltz, D.Johnson, ”A performance comparison of multi hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols”, 1998, 85-87.

[6]M. Abolhasan, T. Wysocki, E.Dutkiewicz, “A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks”, 2004, pages 1-22.

[7]Sunil Taneja, Ashwani Kush, “Evaluation of Normalised Routing Load for MANET”, Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011.

[8]Aleksandr Huhtonen, “Comparing AODV and OLSR Routing Protocols”, HUT T-110-551, Seminar on Internetworking.

[9]S. Corson, J. Macker, “Routing Protocol Performance Issues and Evaluation Considerations”, RFC 2501, 1999.

[10]Mdhavi W. Subbarao, “Ad Hoc Networking Critical Features and Performance Metrics”, Wireless Communications Technology Group, NIST, October 7, 1999.

[11]T. Clausen, C. Dearlove, B. Adamson, “Jitter Considerations in MANET”, RFC [5148], 2008.

[12]S.Mohapatra, P.Kanungo, “Performance analysis of AODV, DSR, OLSR, and DSDV Routing Protocols Using NS2 simulator”, International Conference on Communication Technology.

[13]Elizabeth M. Royer ”A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks”, IEEE Personal Communications, 1999.

[14]Sarkar S, Basavaraju T.G. and Puttamadappa C., “Ad-Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks: Principles, protocols and applications”, Auerbach Publications, 2008.

[15]C. Hedrick,” Routing Information Protocol (RIP)”, IETF RFC1058, June 1988.

[16]NetworkSimulatorVersion3.http://www.nsnam.org/documentation/.

[17]P.Periyasamy, Dr.E.Karthikeyan, "Comparative Performance Analysis of AODV and AODV-MIMC Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad hoc Networks", IJCNIS, vol.6, no.6, pp.54-60, 2014. DOI: 10.5815/ijcnis.2014.06.08