International Journal of Wireless and Microwave Technologies(IJWMT)
ISSN: 2076-1449 (Print), ISSN: 2076-9539 (Online)
Published By: MECS Press
IJWMT Vol.8, No.2, Mar. 2018
MANET Testbed using Raspberry PIs
Full Text (PDF, 446KB), PP.52-63
Mobile ad-hoc networks (MANETs) are without any infrastructure and consists only of equal peers. This paper presents an empirical tests for MANET routing protocols. The testbed based on Linux platform installed in mobile computers. Some parameters are analyzed such as movement speed and the number of hops which impact on routing performance. The testbed consists of several Raspberry Pis (RPis) without the need for any central master device. For making the RPis mobile and independent of any fixed power sockets, each of them is powered by a battery. On the other hand, for the evaluation of the testbed, two routing protocols are chosen. The first protocol is called BABEL, which considered as a distance vector routing algorithm. The other one, the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) which considered as proactive routing protocol. The use case was a multi-hop download of files with different size. The aim is to evaluate how multiple hops influence the bandwidth and delay. The results show that OLSR performs better regarding the throughput. But Babel has less delay and faster regarding convergence.
Cite This Paper
Salem Satia, Ahmed El-bareg," MANET Testbed using Raspberry PIs", International Journal of Wireless and Microwave Technologies(IJWMT), Vol.8, No.2, pp. 52-63, 2018.DOI: 10.5815/ijwmt.2018.02.05
J. S. G. Ramandeep Kaur Nagra and G. S. Grewal, “Simulation based Analysis of AODV, BABEL and PUMA Protocols for Adhoc Network,” in International Journal of Computer Application, 2012.
M. I. Elis Kulla, Masahiro Hiyama and L. Barolli, “Comparison of Experimental Results of a MANET Testbed in Different Environments Considering BATMAN Protocol,” in Third International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, 2011.
F. X. Leonard Barolli, Makoto Ikeda and A. Duresi, “A Testbed for MANETs: Implementation, Experiences and Learned Lessons,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, 2010.
F.Azizan, M. Zuhairi and H. Salleh, “Optimised Link State Routing Protocol Testbed and Performance Evaluation”, International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security(IJCSNS), vol. 16, no. 10, 2016.
D. Lumbantoruan and A. Sagala, “PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF OLSR ROUTING PROTOCOL IN AD HOC NETWORK”, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences , vol. 10, no. 3, 2015.
C. Sørensen, N. Hernández and J. Guerrero, “Easy as Pi: A Network Coding Raspberry Pi Testbed” , Electronics , vol. 5, no. 67, 2016.
P. Regis,,C. Miley and S. Sengupta, “ Multi-hop Mobile Wireless Mesh Network Testbed Development and Measurements”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, vol. 5, no. 3, 2 017.
Lakshman Naik.L, R.U.Khan, R.B.Mishra,"Analysis of Node Density and Pause Time Effects in MANET Routing Protocols using NS-3", International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security(IJCNIS), Vol.8, No.12, pp.9-17, 2016.
Aditya Thapliyal, CRS Kumar,"Development of Data Acquisition Console and Web Server Using Raspberry Pi for Marine Platforms", International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science(IJITCS), Vol.8, No.11, pp.46-53, 2016.
Shelja Sharma, Suresh Kumar Bhardwaj,"Experimental Analysis of OLSR and DSDV Protocols on NS-2.35 in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks", IJCNIS, vol.7, no.8, pp.21-29, 2015.
Raspberry Pi Official website [Online], http://www.raspberrypi.org/ Accessed on 28 Jan 2018.
Jacquet P., Muhlethaler P., Clausen T., Laouiti A, Qayyum A and Viennot L., ―Optimized link state routing protocol for ad hoc networks‖, In proceedings of the 5th IEEE Multi Topic Conference INMIC, pp. 62-68, 2001.
V. Vesel´y, V. Rek, and O. Rysav´y, “Babel routing protocol for omnet++ more than just a new simulation module for INET framework,” CoRR, vol. abs/1609.05215, 2016.
Clausen T. and Jacquet P., ―Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR)‖, RFC 3626, IETF Network Working Group, available online at https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3626, January 2018.