International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security (IJCNIS)
IJCNIS Vol. 12, No. 5, 8 Oct. 2020
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 481KB)
Analyzing the IPv6 Deployment Process in Palestine
Full Text (PDF, 481KB), PP.31-45
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Author(s)
Index Terms
IPv6, IPv6 in Palestine, IPv6 Transition Mechanisms, Internet in Palestine, Migrating to IPv6
Abstract
This paper is to examine the IPv6 in Palestine and to examine where are Palestinian companies in the deployment process. Also, to examine if the infrastructure can withstand the transition to IPv6 or not. This study used quantitative research methods and collect the data through a survey from the Internet companies in Palestine as reported anonymously. Due to the lack of research related to the internet in Palestine, we saw that it is necessary to discover the internet companies and how much they achieved of the deployment process. The collected data have been analyzed and described using SPSS. The data analysis showed that one internet company representing 11% of the companies in Palestine did apply the transition process to IPv6, and the percentages have set a positive indicator for the transition process. It turns out that the other companies on their way to start deploying the IPv6.
Cite This Paper
Yazan W. Abdalaziz, Ala Hamarsheh, "Analyzing the IPv6 Deployment Process in Palestine", International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security(IJCNIS), Vol.12, No.5, pp.31-45, 2020. DOI:10.5815/ijcnis.2020.05.03
Reference
[1]J. Postel, “Internet Protocol California,” USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 791, 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC0791.
[2]G. Huston, IPv4 Address Exhaustion in APNIC. (2015). The ISP Column, A monthly column on things Internet. http://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2015-08/last8.html
[3]R. Hinden, and S. Deering, “IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture,” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 4291, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC4291.
[4]S. Deering, and R. Hinden, “Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification,” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 8200, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC8200.
[5]A. Hamarsheh, M. Goossens, “A Review: Breaking the Deadlocks for Transition to IPv6,” IETE Technical Review, vol.31 no. 6, pp. 405-421, 2014. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/02564602.2014.950348
[6]R. Gilligan, and E. Nordmark, “Transition Mechanisms for IPv6 Hosts and Routers,” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 1933, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC1933.
[7]E. Nordmark, and R. Gilligan, “Basic Transition Mechanisms for IPv6 Hosts and Routers,” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 4213, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC4213.
[8]G. Huston, “Addressing 2018,” The ISP Column, A monthly column on things Internet. http://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2019-01/addr2018.html 2019 (Accessed 2019)
[9]P. Srisuresh, and K. Egevang, “Traditional IP Network Address Translator (Traditional NAT),” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 3022, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC3022.
[10]I. Yamagata, Y. Shirasaki, A. Nakagawa, J. Yamaguchi, and H. Ashida, "NAT444," Internet Engineering Task Force, 2012. in Press.
[11]A. Hamarsheh, “Deploying IPv4-only Connectivity across Local IPv6-only Access Networks,” IETE Technical Review, vol. 35, to be published, 2018.
[12]S. Thomson, and T. Narten, “IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration,” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 2462, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC2462.
[13]B. Carpenter, and K. Moore, “Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds,” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 3056, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC3056.
[14]K. Tsuchiya, H. Higuchi, and Y. Atarashi, “Dual Stack Hosts using the "Bump-In-the-Stack" Technique (BIS),” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 2767, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC2767.
[15]S. Lee, M-K. Shin, Y-J. Kim, E. Nordmark, and A. Durand, “Dual Stack Hosts Using "Bump-in-the-API" (BIA),” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 3338, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC3338.
[16]B. Huang, H. Deng, and T. Savolainen, “Dual-Stack Hosts Using "Bump-in-the-Host" (BIH),” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 6535, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC6535.
[17]X. Li, C. Bao, and F. Baker, “IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm,” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 6145, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC6145.
[18]M. Bagnulo, A. Sullivan, P. Matthews, and I. van Beijnum, “DNS64: DNS Extensions for Network Address Translation from IPv6 Clients to IPv4 Servers,” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 6147, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC6147.
[19]E. Nordmark, “Stateless IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm (SIIT),” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 2765, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC2765.
[20]A. Hamarsheh, M. Goossens, and A. Al-Qerem, “Assuring Interoperability Between Heterogeneous (IPv4/IPv6) Networks Without using Protocol Translation,” IETE Technical Review, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 114-132, 2012.
[21]A. Durand, R. Droms, J. Woodyatt, and Y. Lee, “Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4 Exhaustion,” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 6333, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC6333.
[22]M. Bagnulo, P. Matthews, and I. van Beijnum, “Stateful NAT64: Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6 Clients to IPv4 Servers,” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 6146, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC6146.
[23]A. Hamarsheh, M. Goossens, R. Alasem, “Decoupling Application IPv4/IPv6 Operation from the Underlying IPv4/IPv6 Communication (DAC),” American Journal of Scientific Research, Eurojournals Press, Issue 14 pp. 101-121, 2011.
[24]W. Townsley, and O. Troan, “IPv6 Rapid Deployment on IPv4 Infrastructures (6rd) Protocol Specification,” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 5969, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC5969.
[25]R. Despres, “IPv6 Rapid Deployment on IPv4 Infrastructures (6rd),” California, USA: Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 5569, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC5569.
[26]Ala Hamarsheh, M. Goossens, R. Alasem, Deploying IPv6 Service Across Local IPv4 Access Networks. Presented at 10th WSEAS International Conference on TELECOMMUNICATIONS and INFORMATICS (TELE-INFO '11), pp. 94-100, Lanzarote, Canary Islands, Spain, May 27-29, 2011.
[27]Ala Hamarsheh and M. Goossens, “Exploiting Local IPv4-only Access Networks to Deliver IPv6 Service to End-users,” International Journal of Computers and Communications, vol. 5, no. 3, 2011.
[28]Ala Hamarsheh, M. Goossens, and R. Alasem, “Configuring Hosts to Autodetect (IPv6, IPv6-in-IPv4, or IPv4) Network Connectivity,” KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 1230-1251, 2011.
[29]Ala Hamarsheh, Yazan AbdAlaziz, Transition to IPv6 Protocol, Where We Are, 2019 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCIS), IEEE Xplore Digital Library, 2019.