IJCNIS Vol. 16, No. 3, 8 Jun. 2024
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 1224KB)
PDF (1224KB), PP.70-83
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Numerical Optimisation, Model-based Parameter Estimation, Convergence Criteria, Precision Accuracy, Propagation Model, Radio Frequency, Attenuation
Model-based parameter estimation, identification, and optimisation play a dominant role in many aspects of physical and operational processes in applied sciences, engineering, and other related disciplines. The intricate task involves engaging and fitting the most appropriate parametric model with nonlinear or linear features to experimental field datasets priori to selecting the best optimisation algorithm with the best configuration. Thus, the task is usually geared towards solving a clear optimsation problem. In this paper, a systematic-stepwise approach has been employed to review and benchmark six numerical-based optimization algorithms in MATLAB computational Environment. The algorithms include the Gradient Descent (GRA), Levenberg-Marguardt (LEM), Quasi-Newton (QAN), Gauss-Newton (GUN), Nelda-Meald (NEM), and Trust-Region-Dogleg (TRD). This has been accomplished by engaging them to solve an intricate radio frequency propagation modelling and parametric estimation in connection with practical spatial signal data. The spatial signal data were obtained via real-time field drive test conducted around six eNodeBs transmitters, with case studies taken from different terrains where 4G LTE transmitters are operational. Accordingly, three criteria in connection with rate of convergence Results show that the approximate hessian-based QAN algorithm, followed by the LEM algorithm yielded the best results in optimizing and estimating the RF propagation models parameters. The resultant approach and output of this paper will be of countless assets in assisting the end-users to select the most preferable optimization algorithm to handle their respective intricate problems.
Joseph Isabona, Sayo A. Akinwumi, Theophilus E. Arijaje, Odesanya Ituabhor, Agbotiname Lucky Imoize, "Parameter Estimation of Cellular Communication Systems Models in Computational MATLAB Environment: A Systematic Solver-based Numerical Optimization Approaches", International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security(IJCNIS), Vol.16, No.3, pp.70-83, 2024. DOI:10.5815/ijcnis.2024.03.06
[1]Dahao Yang, Zhong-Rong Lu, Li Wang, Parameter identification of bolted joint models by trust-region Constrained Sensitivity approach, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 99, 2021, pp. 204-227,
[2]Basim A. Hassan, Kanikar Muangchoo, Fadhil Alfarag, Abdulkarim Hassan Ibrahim and Auwal Bala Abubaka, Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vol. 22, No. 2, May 2021, pp. 997~1005. DOI: 10.11591/ijeecs.v22.i2.pp997-1005
[3]Bellavia S.; Macconi M.; Pieraccini S. Constrained dogleg methods for nonlinear systems with, simple bounds in: Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 53 n. 3, pp. 771-794. 2012.
[4]Ogbonda, C., Isabona, J., & Olukanni, S. E., A Wavelet Genetic Algorithm Based Signal Path Loss Model for Evolved Nodeb Cell Sites Planning and Effective Coverage of Wireless Communication System, International Journal of Innovations in Engineering, Science and Technology, Vol. 12, Number 2, 2023. https://www.bwjournal.org/index.php/bsjournal/article/view/1279
[5]Reza Barati, Parameter Estimation of Nonlinear Muskingum Models using Nelder-Mead Simplex Algorithm, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 11, pp. 946-954. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000379.
[6]Aijia Ouyang, Li-Bin Liu, Zhou Sheng, Fan Wu, "A Class of Parameter Estimation Methods for Nonlinear Muskingum Model Using Hybrid Invasive Weed Optimization Algorithm", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 573894, 15 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/573894
[7]Easa S.B, New and improved four parameter nonlinear Muskingum model. Proc Inst Civil Eng: Water Manag 167(5):288–298. doi:10.1680/wama.12.00113.
[8]Christian Blum, Gabriela Ochoa, A Comparative Analysis of two Matheuristics by means of Merged Local Optima Networks, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 290, Issue 1, 2021, pp. 36-56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.008.
[9]E. M.T. Hendric, and A. Lancinskas, On Benchmarking Stochastic Global Optimization Algorithms, Informatica, 2015, Vol. 26, No. 4, 649–662, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2015.69.
[10]Adrian Wills, Thomas B. Schon, and Carl Jidling, A fast quasi-Newton-type method for large-scale stochastic optimization, Preprints of the 21st IFAC World Congress (Virtual) Berlin, Germany, July 12-17, 2020
[11]Mascarenhas (2013), "The divergence of the BFGS and Gauss Newton Methods", Mathematical Programming, 147 (1253–276, arXiv:1309.7922, doi:10.1007/s10107-013-0720-6, S2CID 14700106
[12]K. Amini, F. Rostami, and G. Caristi, “An efficient Levenberg-Marquardt method with a new LM parameter for systems of nonlinear equations,” Optimization, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 637–650, 2018.
[13]Wright, M.H.: Nelder, Mead, and the other simplex method, Documenta Mathematica, Exra Volume: Optimization Stories (2012) 271-276
[14]Trust-Region Methods. In: Numerical Optimization. Springer Series in Operational Research and financial engineering> Springer New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5_4.