International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security (IJCNIS)
IJCNIS Vol. 6, No. 4, 8 Mar. 2014
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 827KB)
Interoperability Framework for Vehicular Connectivity in Advanced Heterogeneous Vehicular Network
Full Text (PDF, 827KB), PP.1-12
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Author(s)
Index Terms
Failure Connectivity Probability, Failure Access Probability, MAC, V2V, V2R, AHVN
Abstract
Advanced heterogeneous vehicular network (AHVN) is a promising architecture for providing vehicular services in the next generation of vehicular networks. AHVN is an integrated architecture between vehicular ad hoc networks and existing cellular wireless networks. In this work, we propose a Multihop vehicular connectivity model in V2V system, which depends on the physical characteristics of the roadways and false hop initiation connectivity. Then, we determine the failure probability of vehicular connectivity in V2V system. Based on interoperability utility, we employ the failure connectivity probability as a handover criterion to communicate with V2R networks. Subsequently, we propose an efficient medium access control (MAC) method based on collaborative codes for resource management in AHVN. As a result, we determine the failure access probability by employing a Markov chain model. The analysis of the proposed MAC in terms of transmission capacity, delay and access failure probability is driven. The numerical and simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework.
Cite This Paper
Saied M. Abd El-atty, Konstantinos Lizos, "Interoperability Framework for Vehicular Connectivity in Advanced Heterogeneous Vehicular Network", International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security(IJCNIS), vol.6, no.4, pp.1-12, 2014. DOI:10.5815/ijcnis.2014.04.01
Reference
[1]W. Chen, S. Cai, “Ad hoc peer to peer network architecture for vehicle safety communications,” IEEE Communication. Magazine. Vol. 43, No. 4, April 2005, pp.100-107.
[2]I. Lequerica, P. M. Ruiz and V. Cabrera, “Improvement of Vehicular Communications by Using 3G Capabilities to Disseminate Control Information” IEEE Net, Vol.24, No.1, January/February 2010, pp.32-38.
[3]RITA: http://www.standards.its.dot.gov.
[4]W. Alasmary and W. Zhuang “The Mobility Impact in IEEE 802.11p Infrastructure less Vehicular Networks,” Elsevier Ad Hoc Networks Journal, Vol.10, No. 2, March 2012, pp. 222-230.
[5]Ekram H., G. Chow, CM. Leung, R. Mcleod, J. Misic and O. Yang,“ Vehicular Telematics Over Heterogeneous Wireless networks: A Survey,” Computer Communication, Vol. 33, 2010, pp.775-793.
[6]A. V. Babu and V. K. Muhammed Ajeer, “Analytical Model for Connectivity of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks in the Presence of Channel Randomness,” Wiley, International Journal of Communication Systems, 2011, DOI: 10.1002/dac.1379.
[7]T. Taleb and A. Benslimmane, “Design Guidelines for a Networks Architecture Integrating V2V with 3G & Beyond Networks,” Proc. IEEE Globecom, 2010, pp.1-5.
[8]A. Benslimane, T. Taleb and R. Sivaraj “Dynamic Clustering-Based Adaptive Mobile Gateway Management in Integrated V2V-3G Heterogeneous Wireless Networks” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Comm, Vol. 29, No. 3, March 2011, pp. 559 - 570.
[9]S. Chun Ng, W. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Yang and G. Mao, “Analysis of Access and Connectivity Probabilities in Vehicular Relay Networks” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication,Vol.29, No.1,January 2011, pp.140-150.
[10]CarTalk, 2000, http://www.cartalk2000.net.
[11]FleetNet Program, 2001, http://www.fleetnet.de.
[12]T. Luan, X. Ling and X. (Sherman) Shen, “MAC performance Analysis for Vehicle to Infrastructure Comm,” Proc. IEEE WCNC, 2010, pp.1-5.
[13]M. Sepulcre, J. Gozalvez, J. Harri and H. Hartenstein,” Contextual Communications Congestion Control for Cooperative Vehicular Networks” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Comm, Vol. 10, No. 2, February 2011, pp.385-389.
[14]T. Zhou, H. Sharif, M. Hempel, P. Mahasukhon, W. Wang, and T. Ma “A Novel Adaptive Distributed Cooperative Relaying MAC Protocol for Vehicular Networks” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Comm, Vol. 29, No. 1, January 2011, pp.72-82.
[15]Sok-Ian Sou and Tonguz O.K.” Enhancing V2V Connectivity through Roadside Units on Highways” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technology, Vol. 60, No. 8, January 2011, pp. 3586 - 3602.
[16]I. Zeadally, R. Hunt, Y. Chen, A. Irwin and A. Hassan, “Vehicular ad hoc networks (V2V): status, results and challenges” Springer Telecommunication Systems, Online First, 2012, pp.1-25.
[17]M. Schonhof, A. Kesting, M. Treiber, D. Helbinga,”Coupled Vehicle and Information Flows: Message Transport on a Dynamic Vehicle Network”, Elsevier, Physica A, vol. 363, no.1, April 2006, pp.73-81.
[18]ANSI-IEEE 802.11 Standard: “Wireless lan medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications 802.11,” 1999.
[19]C. Wang, X. Cheng and D. Laurenson, “Vehicle-to-Vehicle Channel Modeling and Measurements: Recent Advances and Future Challenges,” IEEE Comm. Magz., Nov. 2009, pp. 96 -102.
[20]T. Murray, M. Cojocari and Fu Huirong,“Measuring the performance of IEEE 802.11p using ns-2 simulator for vehicular networks” Proc. IEEE EIT, 2008, 498 – 503.
[21]Abbani, N., Jomaa, M., Tarhini, T., Artail, H., El-Hajj, W., "Managing Social Networks in vehicular networks using trust rules", IEEE Symposium on Wireless Technology and Applications (ISWTA), p.p: 168-173, Sept. 2011.
[22]Ridong Fei, Kun Yang, Xueqi Cheng, "A cooperative social and vehicular network and its dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithms", IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), p.p.: 63-67, April 2011.
[23]I. Lequerica,, M. Garci?a Longaron, P.M. Ruiz, "Drive and share: efficient provisioning of social networks in vehicular scenarios", IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol: 48, Issue: 11, p.p: 90-97, Nov. 2010.
[24]A. Alganas, Lin Xiaodong, A. Grami, "EVSE: An Efficient Vehicle Social Evaluation Scheme with Location Privacy Preservation for Vehicular Communications", IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), p.p.:1-5, June 2011.