[1]Weinstein, R. S., Graham, A. R., Richter, L. C., Barker, G. P., Krupinski, E. A., Lopez, A. M., ... & Gilbertson, J. R. (2009). Overview of telepath logy, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future. Human pathology, 40(8), 1057-1069.

[2]Khalkhali, I., Mena, I., & Diggles, L. (1994). Review of imaging techniques for the diagnosis of breast cancer: a new role of prone scintimammography using technetium-99m sestamibi. European journal of nuclear medicine, 21(4), 357-362.

[3]Astrakhantsev FA, Ivanov AV, Erdneeva NV, "X-ray diagnosis of lung cancer and its morphological variants" Vestn Rentgenol Radiol. 2004 May-Jun;(3):26-31.

[4]Pietrobelli, A. N. G. E. L. O., Formica, C. A. R. M. E. L. O., Wang, Z. I. M. I. A. N., &Heymsfield, S. B. (1996). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition model: review of physical concepts. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology And Metabolism, 271(6), E941-E951.

[5]Koningsberger, D. C., &Prins, R. (1988). X-ray absorption: principles, applications, techniques of EXAFS, SEXAFS, and XANES.

[6]Neill Serman, Radiographic errors and artifacts. August 2000.

[7]Heywang-Köbrunner, Sylvia H., Astrid Hacker, and Stefan Sedlacek. "Advantages and disadvantages of mammography screening." Breast care 6.3 (2011): 199-207.

[8]Iared, W., Shigueoka, D. C., Torloni, M. R., Velloni, F. G., Ajzen, S. A., Atallah, Á. N., & Valente, O. (2011). Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 129(4), 250-260.

[9]R.Ramani, N.Suthanthira Vanitha,"Computer A ided Detection of Tumours in Mammograms", IJIGSP, vol.6, no.4, pp.54-59, 2014.DOI: 10.5815/ijigsp.2014.04.07.

[10]Eklund GW, Cardenosa G, Parsons W. Assessingadequacy of Mammographic image quality. Radiology 1994; 190:297–307.

[11]Ayyala RS, Chorlton M, Behrman RH, et al. Digital mammographic artifacts on full-filled systems: what are they and how do I fi them? RadioGraphics 2008; 28:1999–2008

[12]Pisano ED, Cole EB, Hemminger BM, et al. Imageprocessing algorithms for Digital mammography: a pictorial essay. RadioGraphics 2000; 20:1479–1491.

[13]Richards, C. L., Viadro, C. I., & Earp, J. A. (1998).Bringing down the barriers to mammography: a review of current research and interventions.Breast disease, 10(3-4), 33-44.

[14]Gregg, E. W., Kriska, A. M., Salamone, L. M., Roberts, M. M., Aderson, S. J., Ferrell, R. E., Cauley, J. A. (1997). The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: a review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk. Osteoporosis international, 7(2), 89-99

[15]Bailey, M. R., Khokhlova, V. A., Sapozhnikov, O. A., Kargl, S. G., & Crum, L. A. (2003). Physical mechanisms of the therapeutic effect of ultrasound (a review).Acoustical Physics, 49(4), 369-388.

[16]Matalon TA, Silver B. US guidance of interventional procedures. Radiology 1990; 174:43–47.

[17]Scanlan KA. Sonographic artifacts and their origins., AJR Am J Roentgenol; 156(6):1267–1272.

[18]Cabeza, R., & Nyberg, L. (2000).Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies.Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 12(1), 1-47.

[19]Glaser, M., Luthra, S. K., & Brady, F. (2003). Applications of positron-emitting halogens in PET oncology (Review). International journal of oncology, 22(2), 253-267.

[20]Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G,Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans MedImaging 1997; 16:187 – 98.

[21]Slomka PJ. Software approach to merging molecular with anatomic information. J Nucl Med 2004; 45:36–45S

[22]Mattes D, Haynor DR, Vesselle H, Lewellen TK, Eubank W. PET-CT image registration in thechestusing free-form deformations.IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003;22:120 – 34.

[23]Wes t J, Fitzpatrick JM, Wang MY, Dawan t BM, Maurer Jr CR, Kessler RM, et al. Comparison andevaluation of retrospective inter modality brain image registration techniques. J Computer AssistTomogr 1997; 21:554 – 66.

[24]West J, Fitzpatrick JM, Wang MY, Da want BM, Maurer Jr CR, Kessler R M, et al. Retrospectiveinter modality registration techniques for images of the head: surface-based versus volume-based. IEEETrans Med Imaging 1999; 18:144 – 50.

[25]Stearns C, Miesbauer D, Culp R. Measuring gantry and gantry-table alignment in PET-CT. In: IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record, 2003.

[26]Beyer T, Antoch G, Blodgett T, Freudenberg LF, Akhurst T, Mueller S. Dual-modality PET-CT imaging: the effect of AC F -artifact, respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology. Eur J Nucl Med 2003;30:588 – 96

[27]Stacy, M. R., Maxfield, M. W., &Sinusas, A. J. (2012).Targeted molecular imaging of angiogenesis in PET and SPECT: a review.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 85(1), 75.

[28]Rosenthal, M. S., Cullom, J., Hawkins, W., Moore, S. C., Tsui, B. M. W., & Yester, M. (1995). Quantitative SPECT imaging: a review and recommendations by the Focus Committee of the Society of Nuclear Medicine Computer and Instrumentation Council. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 36(8), 1489-1513.

[29]Rahmim, A., & Zaidi, H. (2008). PET versus SPECT: strengths, limitations and challenges. Nuclear medicine communications, 29(3), 193-207.

[30]Andreas K. Buck, Stephan Nekolla, Sibylle Ziegler, Ambros Beer, Bernd J. Krause1, Ken Herrmann, Klemens Scheidhauer, Hans-Juergen Wester, Ernst J. Rummeny, Markus Schwaiger, and Alexander Drzezga:- SPECT/CT.

[31]Vercruyssen, M., Jacobs, R., Van Assche, N., & van Steenberghe, D. (2008). The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 35(6), 454-474.

[32]Hu, H. (1999). Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction. Medical physics, 26(1), 5-18.

[33]Atiyeh Hashemi,Abdol Hamid Pilevar,Reza Rafeh,"Mass Detection in Lung CT Images Using Region Growing Segmentation and Decision Making Based on Fuzzy Inference System and Artificial Neural Network", IJIGSP , vol.5, no.6, pp.16-24, 2013.DOI: 10.5815/ijigsp.2013.06.03

[34]Xing Li,Ruiping Wang,"A new efficient 2D combined with 3D CAD system for solitary pulmonary nodule detection in CT images",IJIGSP, vol.3, no.4, pp.18-24, 2011.

[35]Hsieh J: Computed tomography: Principles, design, artifacts, and recent Advances. SPIE,Bellingham, WA. (2003).

[36]Fleischmann D, Boas FE, Tye GA, Sheehan D, Molvin LZ: Effect of low Radiationdose on image noise and subjective image quality for analytic v/s Iterative image reconstruction in abdominal CT. In: RSNA. Chicago 2011.

[37]Dempsey, M. F., Condon, B., & Hadley, D. M. (2002, October). MRI safety review. In Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI (Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 392-401). WB Saunders.

[38]Henkelman, R. M., Stanisz, G. J., & Graham, S. J. (2001). Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review. NMR in Biomedicine, 14(2), 57-64.

[39]Tanuj Kumar Jhamb, Vinith Rejathalal, V.K. Govindan,"A Review on Image Reconstruction through MRI k-Space Data", IJIGSP, vol.7, no.7, pp.42-59, 2015.DOI: 10.5815/ijigsp.2015.07.06

[40]Saloner D, "Flow and motion," Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1999 Nov; 7(4):699-715.

[41]Barish MA and Jara H, "Motion artifact control in body MR imaging," Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clin NAm 1999 May; 7(2):289-301.

[42]Hedley M, Yan H, "Motion artifact suppression: a review of post-processing Techniques," Magn Reson Imaging 1992; 10(4):627-35.

[43]Elster AD, Burdette JH. Questions & Answers in Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2001.

[44]Ntziachristos, V., & Chance, B. (2000). Breast imaging technology: Probing physiology and molecular function using optical imaging-applications to breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research, 3(1), 41.

[45]Pittman, T. B., Shih, Y. H., Strekalov, D. V., &Sergienko, A. V. (1995).Optical imaging by means of two-photon quantum entanglement.Physical Review A, 52(5), R3429.

[46]D. Huang, E. A. Swanson, C.P. lin, J.S. Schuman, W.g. Stinson, W. Chang, M.R. Flotte, K. Gregory, C.A.Puliafito, "Optical Coherence Tomography",Science 254, 1178-1181 (1991). 

[47]Momose, Atsushi. "Recent advances in X-ray phase imaging." Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 44.9R (2005): 6355.

[48]Harvey, Christopher J., et al. "Advances in ultrasound." Clinical radiology57.3 (2002): 157-177.

[49]Todd-Pokropek, Andrew. "Advances in PET and Spect." Physics for Medical Imaging Applications. Springer Netherlands, 2007. 321-340.

[50]Pathak, Arvind P., et al. "Molecular and functional imaging of cancer: advances in MRI and MRS." Essential Bioimaging Methods (2009): 183.

[51]Choy, Garry, Peter Choyke, and Steven K. Libutti. "Current advances in molecular imaging: noninvasive in vivo bioluminescent and fluorescent optical imaging in cancer research." Molecular Imaging 2.4 (2003): 303-312.

[52]M. Wojtkowski, T. Bajraszewski, P. Targowski and A. Kowalczyk "Real time in vivo imaging by high-speedspectral optical coherence tomography", Opt. Lett. 28, 1745-1747 (2003)

[53]Ishikawa, Tetsuya, et al. "A compact X-ray free-electron laser emitting in the sub-angstrom region." Nature Photonics 6.8 (2012): 540-544.

[54]Glantz, Chris, and Leslie Purnell. "Clinical utility of sonography in the diagnosis and treatment of placental abruption." Journal of ultrasound in medicine 21.8 (2002): 837-840.

[55]Penninck, Dominique. Atlas of small animal ultrasonography. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.

[56]Van der Vaart, M. G., et al. "Application of PET/SPECT imaging in vascular disease." European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 35.5 (2008): 507-513.

[57]Dueholm, Margit, and Erik Lundorf. "Transvaginal ultrasound or MRI for diagnosis of adenomyosis." Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology19.6 (2007): 505-512.

[58]Gobin, André M., et al. "Near-infrared resonant nanoshells for combined optical imaging and photothermal cancer therapy." Nano letters 7.7 (2007): 1929-1934.