IJIGSP Vol. 9, No. 5, 8 May 2017
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 651KB)
Full Text (PDF, 651KB), PP.20-27
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Telemedicine, H.265, Compression Standard, Minimizing Bandwidth, Stream Compression, Live Video Streaming, Network Delay Improvement, Diagnostic Camera
The aim of telemedicine system is to diagnose patients remotely; this includes healthcare provision to patients in far flung areas. The process of remote diagnosis is mainly dependent on bandwidths which are absolutely essential in terms of communications via the networks. Such communications have to be carefully monitored, because randomly sending data across the network and loading of packets as direct stream of cameras would result in chocking the bandwidth. Hence it is extremely important to make sure that the data is compressed so that there is minimum usage of bandwidth. But this has to be done in a way that maintains the quality at its best. This retention of good quality along with minimizing the usage of data is done by means of compression the streams obtained through cameras and then decompressing the data at the other end. This purpose was previously achieved by H.264 codec. Our major target was up gradation of the existing codec by introducing the latest; H.265. The Libde265 (Decoder) and the x265 (encoder) libraries have been used for the purpose of developing the H.265 codec. The H265 is an advanced codec, having better quality and ability to achieve far better compression than its predecessor. It has been shown through the algorithm and coding of H.265 that is has better compressing ability and the quality is maintained during the transmission of videos. This is highly desirable for the field of telemedicine as it can make improvements in providing healthcare services by easing the transmission of data in the form of videos from the patient end to the doctor’s end.
Hafiz Suliman Munawar, Asad Ali Awan, Usama Khalid, Saba Munawar, Adnan Maqsood,"Revolutionizing Telemedicine by Instilling H.265", International Journal of Image, Graphics and Signal Processing(IJIGSP), Vol.9, No.5, pp.20-27, 2017. DOI: 10.5815/ijigsp.2017.05.03
[1]World Health Organization. (2010). Telemedicine: Opportunities and Developments in Member States. Report on the Second Global Survey on E-Health. World Health Organization.
[2]Bensink, M., Hailey, D., & Wootton, R. (2006). A systematic review of successes and failures in home telehealth: preliminary results. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 12(suppl 3), 8-16.
[3]Wootton, R. (2012). Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management–an evidence synthesis. Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 18(4), 211-220.
[4]Whitten, P. S., Mair, F. S., Haycox, A., May, C. R., Williams, T. L., & Hellmich, S. (2002). Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. Bmj, 324(7351), 1434-1437.
[5]Rajan, B., Seidmann, A., & Friedman, D. (2017, January). Managing Migraine via Telemedicine: Clinical Effectiveness and Process Implications. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[6]Sood, A., Granick, M. S., Trial, C., Lano, J., Palmier, S., Ribal, E., & Téot, L. (2016). The role of telemedicine in wound care: A review and analysis of a database of 5,795 patients from a mobile wound-healing center in Languedoc-Roussillon, France. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 138(3S), 248S-256S.
[7]Weinstein, R. S., Lopez, A. M., Joseph, B. A., Erps, K. A., Holcomb, M., Barker, G. P., & Krupinski, E. A. (2014). Telemedicine, telehealth, and mobile health applications that work: opportunities and barriers. The American journal of medicine, 127(3), 183-187.
[8]Yoo, B. K., Kim, M., Sasaki, T., Melnikow, J., & Marcin, J. P. (2016). Economic evaluation of telemedicine for patients in ICUs. Critical care medicine, 44(2), 265-274.
[9]Ayatollahi, H., Sarabi, F. Z. P., & Langarizadeh, M. (2015). Clinicians’ knowledge and perception of telemedicine technology. Perspectives in health information management, 12(Fall).
[10]Amadi-Obi, A., Gilligan, P., Owens, N., & O’Donnell, C. (2014). Telemedicine in pre-hospital care: a review of telemedicine applications in the pre-hospital environment. International journal of emergency medicine, 7(1), 1.
[11]Gibson, J., Lightbody, E., McLoughlin, A., McAdam, J., Gibson, A., Day, E., ... & Ford, G. A. (2016). ‘It was like he was in the room with us’: patients’ and carers’ perspectives of telemedicine in acute stroke. Health Expectations, 19(1), 98-111.
[12]Sims, J. M. (2016). Communities of practice: telemedicine and online medical communities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
[13]Gamble, J.E., Savage, G.T. and Icenogle, M.L., 2004. Value-chain analysis of a rural health program: toward understanding the cost benefit of telemedicine applications. Hospital topics, 82(1), p.10.
[14]Wagner, K. L., & Schafer, D. J. (2016). Using Telemedicine to Provide Safe Care When Birth Occurs in the Emergency Department. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 45(3), S11-S12.
[15]Xiang, W., Wang, G., Pickering, M., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Big video data for light-field-based 3D telemedicine. IEEE Network, 30(3), 30-38.
[16]Panayides, A., Eleftheriou, I., & Pantziaris, M. (2013). Open-source telemedicine platform for wireless medical video communication. International journal of telemedicine and applications, 2013.
[17]Durner, G., Durner, J., Dunsche, H., Walle, E., Kurzreuther, R., & Handschu, R. (2016). 24/7 Live Stream Telemedicine Home Treatment Service for Parkinson's Disease Patients. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice.
[18]Chakareski, J. (2013). Adaptive multiview video streaming: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(5), 94-100.
[19]Seeling, P., & Reisslein, M. (2012). Video transport evaluation with H. 264 video traces. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 14(4), 1142-1165.
[20]Stutz, T., & Uhl, A. (2012). A survey of h. 264 avc/svc encryption. IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, 22(3), 325-339.
[21]Panayides, A., Antoniou, Z. C., Mylonas, Y., Pattichis, M. S., Pitsillides, A., & Pattichis, C. S. (2013). High- resolution, low-delay, and error-resilient medical ultrasound video communication using H. 264/AVC over mobile WiMAX networks. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 17(3), 619-628.
[22]Xu, D., Wang, R., & Wang, J. (2012). Prediction mode modulated data-hiding algorithm for H. 264/AVC. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, 7(4), 205-214.
[23]Kim, H., Rhee, C. E., & Lee, H. J. (2015). An Effective Combination of Power Scaling for H. 264/AVC Compression. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 23(11), 2685-2689.
[24]Wang, Y., Li, P., Zhang, P., Zhang, C., & Cong, J. (2013, May). Memory partitioning for multidimensional arrays in high-level synthesis. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Design Automation Conference (p. 12). ACM.
[25]Quinlan, J. J., Zahran, A. H., & Sreenan, C. J. (2016, May). Datasets for AVC (H. 264) and HEVC (H. 265) evaluation of dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH). In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multimedia Systems (p. 51). ACM.
[26]Torres, A., Pinol, P., Calafate, C. T., Cano, J. C., & Manzoni, P. (2014, April). Evaluating h. 265 real-time video flooding quality in highway V2V environments. In 2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) (pp. 2716-2721). IEEE.
[27]Asaduzzaman, A., & Gunasekara, G. H. (2014). Power and performance analysis of multimedia applications running on low-power devices by cache modeling. Multimedia tools and applications, 72(1), 207-230.
[28]Grois, D., Marpe, D., Mulayoff, A., Itzhaky, B., & Hadar, O. (2013, December). Performance comparison of h. 265/mpeg-hevc, vp9, and h. 264/mpeg-avc encoders. In Picture Coding Symposium (PCS), 2013 (pp. 394-397). IEEE.
[29]Wiegand, T., Sullivan, G. J., Bjontegaard, G., & Luthra, A. (2003). Overview of the H. 264/AVC video coding standard. IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, 13(7), 560-576.
[30]Santos, H., Rosário, D., Cerqueira, E., Camargo, J., Schimuneck, M., Nobre, J., & Both, C. (2016, October). A Comparative Analysis of H. 264 and H. 265 with Different Bitrates for on Demand Video Streaming. In Proceedings of the 9th Latin America Networking Conference (pp. 53-58). ACM.
[31]Ohm, J. R., Sullivan, G. J., Sze, V., Wiegand, T., & Budagavi, M. (2016). Introduction to the Special Issue on HEVC Extensions and Efficient HEVC Implementations. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 26(1), 1-3.