Clustering Structure and Deployment of Node in Wireless Sensor Network

Full Text (PDF, 368KB), PP.70-76

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Rajeeb S. Bal 1,* Amiya K. Rath 2

1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Cuttack, 753014, India

2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Cuttack, 754022, India

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2014.10.10

Received: 14 Feb. 2014 / Revised: 10 May 2014 / Accepted: 16 Jul. 2014 / Published: 8 Sep. 2014

Index Terms

WSN (Wireless Sensor Network), Sensor Node (SN), Base Station (BS), Cluster Head (CH), Mobile ad hoc network (MANET)

Abstract

Generally, grouping sensor nodes into clusters has been widely adopted by the research community to satisfy the above scalability objective and generally achieve high energy efficiency and prolong network lifetime in large scale WSN environments. The corresponding hierarchical routing and data gathering protocols imply cluster based organization of the sensor nodes in order that data fusion and aggregation are possible, thus leading to significant energy savings. We propose a clustering approach which organizes the whole network into a connected hierarchy and discuss the design rationale of the different clustering approaches and design principles. Further, we propose several key issues that affect the practical deployment of clustering techniques in wireless sensor network applications.

Cite This Paper

Rajeeb S. Bal, Amiya K. Rath, "Clustering Structure and Deployment of Node in Wireless Sensor Network", International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science(IJITCS), vol.6, no.10, pp.70-76, 2014. DOI:10.5815/ijitcs.2014.10.10

Reference

[1]Jennifer Yick, Biswanath Mukherjee and Dipak Ghosal, "Wireless sensor network survey", ELSEVIER, Volume 52, Issue 12, 22 Aug 2008, pp. 2292-2330. 

[2]J. Al-Karaki and A. Kamal, “Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: A survey”, IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, vol. 11, no. 6, Dec. 2004, pp. 6–28.

[3]R. Shah, S. Roy, S. Jain, and W. Brunette, “Data mules: Modeling and analysis of a three- tier architecture for sparse sensor networks”, Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 1, nos. 2–3, Sept. 2003, pp. 215–233.

[4]I. Chatzigiannakis, A. Kinalis, and S. Nikoletseas, “Sink mobility protocols for data collection in wireless sensor networks”, in Proceeding of the 4th ACM Workshop on Mobility Management and Wireless Access (MobiWac’ 06), Los Angeles, CA, Oct. 2006, pp. 52–59.

[5]E. Royer and C. Toh , “A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless networks”, IEEE Personal Communications , vol. 6, no. 2, Apr. 1999, pp. 46–55.

[6]I. Stojmenovic, Handbook of Sensor Networks Algorithms and Architectures. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ, 2005.

[7]V. Mhatre and C. Rosenberg, “Design guidelines for wireless sensor networks: Communication clustering and aggregation”, Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 2, no. 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 45–63.

[8]V. Mhatre and C. Rosenberg, “Homogeneous vs heterogeneous clustered sensor networks: A comparative study”, in Proceeding of IEEE ICC’04, vol. 6, Paris, France, June 2004, pp. 3646–3651.

[9]C. Bettstetter , “On the minimum node degree and connectivity of a wireless multihop network”, in Proceeding of the 3rd ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing, Lausanne , Switzerland, June 2002 , pp. 80–91.

[10]S. Megerian , F. Koushanfar , M. Potkonjak , and M. B. Srivastava, “Worst and best- case coverage in sensor networks”, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 4, no. 1, Jan.–Feb. 2005, pp. 84–92.