International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS)
IJMECS Vol. 5, No. 7, 8 Jul. 2013
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 155KB)
Evaluation: The New Philosophical Roles & Psychological Means
Full Text (PDF, 155KB), PP.34-40
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Author(s)
Index Terms
Evaluation, philosophy of evaluation, psychology of evaluation, Evaluation fields, Evaluation phases.
Abstract
Evaluation Roles and Means are very broad. It concerns with n number of attributes. This paper discussed the relationship between evaluation & research, philosophy of evaluation, physiology of evaluation, Evaluation in applied psychology. In the above context, how the basic logic of evaluation is set with evaluation fields and the phases of evaluation process.
Cite This Paper
Prashant M. Dolia, "Evaluation: The New Philosophical Roles & Psychological Means", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS), vol.5, no.7, pp. 34-40, 2013. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2013.07.04
Reference
[1]Shadish W.R, Cook T.D, Leviton L.C, “Good Theory for Social program Evaluation” Foundation of program Evaluation, Theories of Practice, Sage Publication P. 36-67, 1991.
[2]Torsten Husen and Neville Postlethwaite,” The International Encyclopedia of Education”, Supplementary Volume – 1, Published by Pergamon, ISBN: 9780080349749, 1988-12-01.
[3]Nybery. D, “Power Over Power: What power means in ordinary life, how it is related to acting freely and What it can do to contribute renovated ethics of education”, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.
[4]Thorstein Veblen, “The place of science in Modern Civilization and other Essays“(University of Toronto), Publisher: New York, 1929.
[5]Hemphill J.K “The Relationship between Research and Evaluation Studies”, Chapter-9, P.189-192, 1969.
[6]Troyer. M. E, “Accuracy and validity in evaluation are not enough” The J.R.Street Lecture for Syracuse. N. Y, Syracuse University press, P. 1-16, 1947.
[7]Dressel P. L, “Role of external testing programs in education in the University of Kansas Conference on External Testing Programs” Kansas studies in Education Vol 14, No 2 University of Kansas., 1964.
[8]Guilford J.P “Lessons from aviation psychology”, Amer. Psychologist,Volume-3,Issue-1 P. 1-11., American psychological Association, ISSN NO: 0003-066X, 1948.
[9]Little J.K, “Result of the use of Machines for testing an drill upon learning in educational Psychology”, Journal of educational Experiment, Vol. 3, P. 45-49, 1934.
[10]Downie N.M, “Fundamentals of Measurement”, Techniques & Practices, Second Edition, Oxford University Press, P. 9-14, 1967.
[11]Scriven Michael, “The nature of evaluation part I”, Relation to psychology. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 6(11), 1999 http://edresearch.org/pare/getvn.asp?v=6&n=11.
[12]Robert D. Tennyson, “Computer-based performance Assessment of Problem Solving”, Computer In Human Behavior, Special Issues, University of Minnesota, 2000.
[13]J.Wayne Wright-stone, “Trends In Evaluation – How have modern evaluative concepts developed”, Bureau of Educational Research, Board of Education of city of New York, 1950.
[14]Wiles, J. and Bondi, J., “Curriculum Development” A Guide to practice (3rd Edition) Merril Publishing Company, 1989.
[15]Aggarwal J.C, “Essential of Examination System, Evaluation, Test and Measurement”, 9.6, P.136-138, 2009.
[16]Harbison F. and C. Myers, “Education, Manpower and Economics Growth” (New york:Mcgraw Hill Book Co,) P. 196, 1964.
[17]Walter F. Heinecke, Laura Blasi & N.Milman, L.Washington, “New Directions in the evaluation of the effectiveness of educational technology”, The Secretary’s Conference of on Education Technology, Curry School of Education, University of Viginia, P. 1-7, 1999.