International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS)
IJMECS Vol. 7, No. 9, 8 Sep. 2015
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 394KB)
Effect of GameMaker on Student Attitudes and Perceptions of Instructors
Full Text (PDF, 394KB), PP.1-13
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Author(s)
Index Terms
GameMaker, general education, computational thinking, attitudes towards computer science
Abstract
Computational thinking including the ability to think critically and solve problems provides benefits for every career path. A positive attitude toward computer science can increase the possibility of students selecting courses that increase computational thinking or pursuing computer science (CS) as a major. This research examined the effect of using GameMaker on the attitudes of students toward computer science (CS) and CS instructors in an introductory CS course. The research consisted of an initial study and a two year longitudinal study. The data was collected using student surveys, qualitative student perceptions, and anonymous teaching evaluations. We hypothesized that students who used GameMaker in their class would show improved attitudes toward CS and would evaluate the instructor more favorably. Our research provides evidence that the incorporation of GameMaker into computer science courses may improve students’ short-term attitudes toward computer science and both long-term and short-term perceptions of the class instructor.
Cite This Paper
Marguerite Doman, Merry Sleigh, Chlotia Garrison, "Effect of GameMaker on Student Attitudes and Perceptions of Instructors", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS), vol.7, no.9, pp.1-13, 2015. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2015.09.01
Reference
[1]R. Kick, AP CS principles: engaging, challenging, and rewarding, ACM Inroads, vol. 6. No. 1, pp. 42-45, March 2015.
[2]Joint Informatics Europe & ACM Europe Working Group on Informatics Education 2013, Informatics education: Europe cannot afford to miss the boat. http://europe.acm.org/iereport/ACMandIEreport.pdf, accessed June 2015.
[3]J. Wing, (2006). Computational Thinking, Communications of the ACM, vol. 49, no 3, March 2006.
[4]L.A. Siiman, M. Pedaste, E. Tonisson, R. Sell, T. Jaakkola and D. Alimisis (2014). A Review of Interventions to Recruit and Retain ICT Students. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, vol. 6, no. 3 pp.45-54, DOI: 10.5815/ijmecs.2014.03.06.
[5]M. Guimaraes, &M. Murray, (2008). An exploratory overview of teaching computer game development. Journal of Computing Sciences in College, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 144-149, October 2008.
[6]M. Overmars, (2004). Teaching computer science through game design. Computer, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 81-83, April 2004.
[7]A. T. Chamillard, (2006). Introductory game creation: No programming required. SIGCSE, Houston, TX, Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pp. 515-519, March 2006.
[8]E. Soloway, (2014). "Should we teach students to program?" Communications of the ACM, vol. 36, no. 10, October 1993: 21+. Academic OneFile. Web. 6 May 2014. http://0-go.galegroup.com.library.winthrop.edu/ps/retrieve.do?sgHitCountType=None&sort=DA-SORT&inPS=true&prodId=AONE&userGroupName=winthropudl&tabID=T002&searchId
=R3&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&contentSegment=&searchType=AdvancedSearchForm¤tPosition=29&contentSet
=GALE%7CA14468382&&docId=GALE|A14468382&docType=GALE&role=&docLevel=FULLTEXT.
[9]J. Margolis, &A. Fisher, (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2002.
[10]D. Agosto, M. Atwood, and S. Gasson, (2008), Changing mental models of the IT professions: a theoretical framework, Journal of Information Technology Education, vol. 7, pp. 205-221, 2008; http://jite.org/documents/Vol7/JITEv7p205-221Agosto323.pdf.
[11]A. Yadav, N. Zhou, C. Mayfield, S. Hambrusch, J. Korb, (2011). Introducing Computational Thinking in Education Courses, SIGCSE’11, March 9-12, 2011.
[12]E. Freudenthal, A. Duval, S. Hug, A. Ogrey, K. Lim, C. Tabor, R. Gonzalez, and A. Siegel, (2011). "Planting the seeds of computational thinking: An introduction to programming suitable for inclusion in STEM curricula" Proceedings of the 118th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, June 2011. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/kien_lim/24.
[13]C.C. Navarrete, (2013) Creative thinking in digital game design and development: A case Study. Computers & Education, vol. 69, pp. 320–331.
[14]N. Dalal, (2012). Teaching tip: Using rapid game prototyping for exploring requirements discovery and modeling. Journal of Information Systems Education, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 341-344.
[15]M. Terlecki, J. Brown, L. Harner-Steciw, J. Irvin-Hannum, R. Marchetto, L. Ruhl, andJ. Wiggins, (2011). Sex differences and similarities in video game experience, preferences, and self-efficacy: Implications for the gaming industry. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 22-33.
[16]J. Whitehead, (2008). Introduction to Game Design in the Large Classroom, GDCSE’08, Feb28-Mar 3, 2008, Miami, FL.
[17]A. Wang and W. Bian (2009). An Application of a Game Development Framework in Higher Education, International Journal of Computer Games Technology, vol. 2009, Article ID 693267, pp. 1-12.
[18]N. Vos, H. Meijden, and E. Denessen (2011), Effects of constructing versus playing an educational game on student motivation and deep learning strategy use, Computers & Education vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 127–137, January 2011.
[19]K. Hoganson, (2010). Teaching programming concepts with GameMaker. Journal of Computing Sciences in College, JCSC, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 181-188, December 2010.
[20]A. Seyal, R. MahbuburandN. Rahman, (2000), Computer attitudes of non-computing academics: a study of technical colleges in Brunei Darussalam, Information & Management, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 169-180, June 2000.
[21]Carmichael, G. (2008). Girls, computer science, and games. SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 107-110, November 2008.
[22]E. N. Wiebe, L. Williams, K. Yang, andC. Miller, (2003). Computer Science Attitude Survey. Report No.: NCSU CSC TR-2003-1. Department of Computer Science, NC State University, Raleigh, NC.
[23]S. Kurkovsky, (2013) Mobile game development: Improving student engagement and motivation in introductory computing courses. Computer Science Education, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 138-157, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2013.777236.
[24]B. C. Wilson, (2006). Gender differences in types of assignments preferred: Implications for computer science instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 245-255, 2006.
[25]A.Settle, J. Lalor, and T. Steinbach. (2015). Reconsidering the Impact of CS1 on Novice Attitudes. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 229-234. DOI=10.1145/2676723.2677235.http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2676723.2677235
[26]K. Singh, K. R. Allen, R. Scheckler, andL. Darlington, (2007). Women in computer-related majors: A critical synthesis of research and theory from 1994 to 2005. Review of Educational Research, vol. 77, pp. 500-533, 2007. doi: 10.3102/0034654307309919.
[27]B. C. Wilson, (2002). A Study of Factors Promoting Success in Computer Science Including Gender Differences. Computer Science Education, vol. 12, no. 1-2, pp. 141-164, 2002.
[28]M. Carbonaro, D. Szafron, M. Cutumisu, andJ. Schaeffer, (2010). Computer-game construction: A gender-neutral attractor to Computing Science. Computers and Education, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1098-1111, 2010.
[29]Qualtrics software, Version 1.611s (0.281, 0.224, 0.031, 0.131, 0.019) of the Qualtrics Research Suite. Copyright © 2014 Qualtrics. Qualtrics and all other Qualtrics product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA. http://www.qualtrics.com, accessed June 2015.