Acceptance of E-Learning among Undergraduates of Computing Degrees in Sri Lanka

Full Text (PDF, 365KB), PP.25-32

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Dushyanthi U. Vidanagama 1,*

1. Kotelawala Defence University, Rathmalana, 10390, Sri Lanka

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2016.04.04

Received: 9 Dec. 2015 / Revised: 5 Jan. 2016 / Accepted: 27 Feb. 2016 / Published: 8 Apr. 2016

Index Terms

E-learning, Technology Acceptance Model, Perceived ease of use, Perceived usefulness, Perceived enjoyment

Abstract

E-learning has become a most popular learning approach of higher education in Sri Lanka, due to the advancements of Information Technology. This study focused on the undergraduates’ acceptance of e-learning as an effective tool. The successfulness of implementing e-learning requires the understanding of end-user acceptance process. Therefore, this study focused on investigating the acceptance of e-learning approach among undergraduates in Western Province, Sri Lanka. The aim of this research was to provide a set of factors to be considered when an E-learning activity is planned and proposed to E-learners in universities of Sri Lanka. The Technology Acceptance Model which was modified by including some factors was used as the basic framework of this study which was suitable for achieving the objectives of the research. This study was based on total sample of 209 students who are following Computing degrees in the universities located in Western Province, Sri Lanka. The results of this study suggested that university students tend to focus more on perceived ease of use on e-learning and the students’ attitude has more influence on intention to use e – learning. So it could be concluded that providing more technological facilities with infrastructure would increase the positive attitude towards using e-learning among university students and behavioral intention to use.

Cite This Paper

Dushyanthi U. Vidanagama, "Acceptance of E-Learning among Undergraduates of Computing Degrees in Sri Lanka", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science(IJMECS), Vol.8, No.4, pp.25-32, 2016. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2016.04.04

Reference

[1]G. Chadha and N. Kumail, “E-learning: an expression of the knowledge economy”, 1993 New Delhi : Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing.
[2]D.S.Priyangika and C.C. Jayasundara, “IT students’ perceptions on e-learning: a preliminary survey at University of Colombo”, 2012, Journal of the University Librarians Association, Sri Lanka, 16(2), pp.160-178.
[3]S.K. Sharma and J.K. Chandel, “Technology Acceptance Model for the use of learning through websites among students in Oman”, 2013, International Arab Journal of e-technology, 3(1), pp.44- 49.
[4]F.D.Davis, R.P.Bagozzi and P.R.Warshaw, “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models”, 1989, Management Science, 35(8), pp. 982-1003.
[5]H.Van der Heijden, “User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems”, 2004, MIS Quarterly,28(4), pp.695-704.
[6]V.Venkatesh and H. Bala , “Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions” ,
[7]D.A. Adams, R.R. Nelson and P.A.Todd, ”Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology : A replication”,1992 ,MIS Quartely, 16(2),pp.227-247.
[8]F.D.Davis, "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology", 1989, MIS Quarterly 13 (3), pp.319-340.
[9]I.Ajzen and M.Fishbein, “Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior”, 1980, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[10]I. Ajzen, “Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior”, 2002, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, pp.665-683.
[11]M. Masrom, “Technology Acceptance Model and E-Learning”, 2007, 12thInternational Conference on Education, ultanHassanalBolkiah Institute of Education, University of Darussalam.
[12]I.Ajzen,”The theory of planned behavior”, 1991, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, pp.179-211.
[13]J.R.Hauser and S.M.Shugan, “Intensity Measures of Consumer Preference”, 1980(March-April), Operation Research, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp.278-320.
[14]D.F. Larcker and V.P.Lessig, “Perceived Usefulness of Information: A Psychometric Examination”, 1980, Decision Sciences, 11 (1).
[15]A.Dillon and M.G.Morris, “User acceptance of information technology: Theories and models”, 1996, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 31, pp.3-32.
[16]J.F.Hair, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham and W.C.Black, “Multivariate Data Analysis”, 1998, (5th ed.) New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International.
[17]P.Kline, “The handbook of psychological testing”, 2000, (2nd ed.), London: Routledge, pp.13.
[18]T. Chesney, “An acceptance model for useful and fun information systems”, 2006, Human Technology, 2(2), pp.225-235.
[19]Goodhue, L. Dale,“Development and measurement validity of a task-technology fit instrument for user evaluations of information systems”, Decision Sciences, 1998, 29(1),pp.105-138.
[20]T.P.Monsuwe, T. Perea,B.G. Dellaert and K.D.Ruyter ,”What drives consumers to shop online? A literature review”, 2004, International Journal of Service Industry Management 15(1), pp. 102-121.
[21]S.M.Song,”E-learning: Investigating students' acceptance of online lerning in hospitality programs”, 2010, Graduate Theses and Dessertations. Paper 11902
[22]B.C.Lee, J.O.Yoon and I.Lee, “Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results”, 2009, Computers & Education.pp.1320-1329
[23]B.L.C.Yiong,H.K.Sam and T.K.Wah,”Acceptance of e learning among distance learners: A Malaysian perspective”,2008, Proceedings ascilite Melbourne
[24]C.P.H.Ernst,K.Wedel and F.Rothlauf , “Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning Technologies: Combining the Technology Acceptance Model with the Didactic Circle”,2014. Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah.