International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS)
IJMECS Vol. 8, No. 6, 8 Jun. 2016
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 450KB)
Game Theory - basis of Higher Education and Teaching Organization
Full Text (PDF, 450KB), PP.41-49
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Author(s)
Index Terms
Game theory, Noncooperative game model, Organization system, Nash equilibrium, learning
Abstract
The process of effective interrelation necessary for teaching the subject at higher school has been represented as a noncooperative game between the professor and the students. This process is the functioning of teaching of organizational system which comprises -pedagogue (professor) and -collective of students. The preference is given to the democratic model of relation - to objective and optimal mutual responsibility of the pedagogue and a student to the rights-obligations imposed on them. Two classes of models of noncooperatve games corresponding to management of system have been built - games with relations of preferences and the games with utility. The main principle of optimality is the Nash equilibrium, or it is such kind of situation, none of the player it is not profitable the unilateral deviation from it. According to the indicated principle of equilibrium the tasks originated in the process of system functioning has been solved. According to the solving results students must study systamatically do their tasks and teachers must be responsible objective for their work.
Cite This Paper
Guram N. Beltadze, "Game Theory - basis of Higher Education and Teaching Organization", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science(IJMECS), Vol.8, No.6, pp.41-49, 2016. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2016.06.06
Reference
[1]J. von Neuman, O. Morgenstern. “Theory of Games and Economic Behavior”. Prinston University Press, 1944, 625 p.
[2]G. Owen. “Game Theory”. Academic Press, Third Edition, 1995, 459 p.
[3]N. N. Vorob’ev. “Foundations of Game Theory. Noncooperative Games”. Birkhauser Verlang, Basel – Boston – Berlin, 1994, 496 p.
[4]G.Beltadze. “Game theory: A mathematikal theory of correlations and equilibrium”. Georgian Technical University, Tbilisi, 2016, 505 p. (in Georgian).
[5]Herbert Gixtis. “Game theory evolving”, Second edition. Princeton University Press, 2009, 409 p.
[6]Erich Prisner. “Game Theory Through Examples”. Franklin University Switzerland. MAA, Published and Distributed by The Mathematical Association of America, 2014, 308 p.
[7]Scott P. Stevens. “Games People Play: Game theory in life, business, and beyond”. Published by: The Great Courses, The Teaching Company,2008, 124 p.
[8]P. Battigalli. “Game theory: Analysis of strategic thinking”. Bocconi University, Milan, 1991, 178 p.
[9]“Lectures in game theory for computer scientists”. Editer by Krzysztof R. Apt and Erich Gradel. Cambridge University Press 2011, 309 p.
[10]Vinay Kumar. “Mathematics Is Science: A Topic Revisited in Context of FCS of India”. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science. Hong Kong, Volume 4, Number 6, 2012, pp. 17-26.
[11]R.M. Alguliyev, R. Sh. Malmudova. “Information Culture Formation as The Most Promising Direction of Individual’s General Culture”. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science. Hong Kong, Volume 7, Number 3, 2015, pp. 54-61.
[12]Sara Fatima, Salha Abdullah. “Improving Teaching Methodology in System Analysis and Design using Problem Based Learning for ABET”. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, Hong Kong, Volume 5, Number 7, 2013, pp. 60-68.
[13]Özgen Korkmaz. “The Effects of Scratch-Based Game Activities on Students’ Attitudes, Self - Efficacy and Academic Achievement”. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, Hong Kong, Volume 8, Number 1, 2016, pp. 16-23.
[14]Avinash Dixit, Susan Skeath.“Games of Strategy”. Second Edition. New York, London, 2004, 675 p.
[15]Drew Fudenberg, David K. Levine, “The Theory of Learning in Games”, MIT Press, 1998, 368 p.
[16]Mouenis Anouar Tadlaoui, Souhaib Aammou, Mohamed Khaldi, Rommel Novaes Carvalho. “Learner Modeling in Adaptive Educational Systems: A Comparative Study”. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, Hong Kong, Volume 8, Number 3, 2016, pp. 1-10.
[17]G.N.Beltadze.“The problem of multiple election in the case of multicriteria candidates”. Transaction Technical University of Georgia. Tbilisi, № 1 (474), 2009, pp. 66-80 (in Georgian).