Implementation of Instructional Design Models without Considering Inclusive Education

PDF (562KB), PP.17-27

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Miguel A. Duque-Vaca 1 Jaime A. Restrepo-Carmona 2 Jonny I. Guaina-Yungan 3 Jovani A. Jimenez-Builes 4,*

1. Department of Computer and Decision Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, 050005, Colombia

2. Department of Organizational Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, 050005, Colombia

3. Faculty of Informatics and Electronics, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo, Riobamba, 060101, Ecuador

4. Department of Computer and Decision Science, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, 050005, Colombia

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2025.01.02

Received: 28 Jul. 2023 / Revised: 19 Aug. 2023 / Accepted: 6 Sep. 2023 / Published: 8 Feb. 2025

Index Terms

Inclusive Education, Sustainable Development Goals, Instructional Design, Accessibility, Virtual Learning Environments

Abstract

At present, education is a matter of global concern and it is the responsibility of all States to be able to provide the ideal conditions so that it is accessible to the entire population. As indicated by one of the objectives of the 2030 Agenda which seeks to guarantee inclusive and equitable education quality. Different studies indicate that instructional design models allow the creation of optimal educational environments for all people and that their correct application allows students to generate satisfactory learning, however, there is an important group of people who are not considered in the tests of these models making it is impossible to reach the goal of achieving the desired educational inclusion. Therefore, the stated objective is to demonstrate that people with some type of disability have not been considered to work and to validate the studies that use different models, approaches or techniques to develop virtual learning environments. The results are worrisome as they demonstrate that of the 90 scientific articles analyzed, only 4.44% have included topics related to disability and of the total sample of participants that total 11,732 people, only 42, that is, 0.36%, had some type of disability. This shows that we are very far from being able to meet the sustainable development goal that seeks to guarantee inclusive and equitable quality education. Based on the results achieved, it is intended to sensitize governments, educational institutions and teachers around the world to work responsibly to close the gap that marginalizes people with disabilities and build appropriate virtual learning environments that guarantee that everyone can access and learn in the best way.

Cite This Paper

Miguel A. Duque-Vaca, Jaime A. Restrepo-Carmona, Jonny I. Guaiña-Yungán, Jovani A. Jimenez-Builes "Implementation of Instructional Design Models without Considering Inclusive Education", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science(IJMECS), Vol.17, No.1, pp. 17-27, 2025. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2025.01.02

Reference

[1]UNESCO, “La educación como derecho humano”. On line: http://www.unescoetxea.org/dokumentuak/Educacion_Derecho_Humano.pdf Access: July, 2023.
[2]Humanium, “Derecho a la educación”. On line: https://www.humanium.org/es/derecho-educacion/ Access: July, 2023.
[3]United Nations, Estadísticas de la discapacidad. Informe conjunto del secretario general y del Grupo de Washington sobre Estadísticas de la Discapacidad. Comisión de Estadística. Washington: United Nations, 2018.
[4]H. T., González, “Instrumento de evaluación para el desarrollo de cursos en entornos virtuales de enseñanza-aprendizaje”. Edutec, Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, (79), 30-45, 2022.
[5]C. M., Reigeluth, Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. London: Routledge, 1983.
[6]G. E., Snelbecker, Learning theory, instructional theory, and psychoeducational design. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 1974.
[7]E., Pérez, A., Vázquez & S., Cambero, “Educación a distancia en tiempos de COVID-19: análisis desde la perspectiva de los estudiantes universitarios”. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 331-350, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.27855.
[8]A., Ariño, M., Martínez, R., Llopis, E., Pons & A., Prades, Via universitària: Accés, condicions d'aprenentatge, expectatives i retorns dels estudis universitaris (2017-2019). Valencia: Xarxa Vives, 2019. 
[9]C., Hodges, S., Moore, B., Lockee, T., Trust & A., “The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning”. Educause Review, 2020. 
[10]P. C., Hu, P. H., Chen & P. C., Kuo, “Educational model based on hands-on brain-computer interface: Implementation of music composition using EEG”. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 982-985, IEEE, 2018.
[11]S., Guri-Rosenblit & B., “E-learning: Confusing terminology, research gaps and inherent challenges”. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 25(1), 2011.
[12]S., Wineburg, S., McGrew, J., Breakstone & T., Ortega, Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning. Stanford University, CA.: Stanford Digital Repository, 2016.
[13]S., García, M., Fernández, E., Costa, J., Juncal & F., González, “Automatic natural language generation applied to alternative and augmentative communication for online video content services using simpleNLG for Spanish. In Proceedings of the 15th Web for All Conference: Internet of Accessible Things, W4A, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3192714.3192837.
[14]Y. B., Hlaoui, L., Zouhaier & L., Ayed, “Model driven approach for adapting user interfaces to the context of accessibility: Case of visually impaired users”. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, pp. 1-28, 2018.
[15]N., Harrati, I., Bouchirika & Z., Mahfouf, “e-Learning: On the uptake of modern technologies for online education”. In 6th International Conference on Information Communication and Management, 2016.
[16]UNESCO, “Educación 2030 Declaración de Incheon”. On line: https://es.unesco.org/themes/liderar-agenda-mundial-educacion-2030 Access: July, 2023.
[17]M., Hernández, Conceptos en la formación sin distancia. En Alvarado, A. y Rodríguez, A. (eds.). Madrid: Servicio Público de Empleo Estatal, 2006.
[18]S., Guri, “E-teaching in higher education: An essential prerequisite for e-learning. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7(2), pp. 93-97, 2018. https://doi.org 10.7821/naer.2018.7.298.
[19]C. J., Bonk, M. M., Lee, T. C., Reeves, T. C., MOOCs and open education around the world. Abington, UK: Taylor & Francis, 2015.
[20]D. E., Matzembacher, R. L., Gonzales & L. F., Nascimento, “From informing to practicing: Students' engagement through practice-based learning methodology and community services”. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(2), 191-200, 2019.
[21]A., Sánchez & D., Castro, “Cerrando la brecha entre nativos e inmigrantes digitales a través de las competencias informáticas e informacionales”. Apertura, vol. 5 (2), pp. 6-15, 2013.
[22]P., Santillán, M., Duque, R., Lozada & F., Molina “Learning by doing through Steam methodology and the use of educational software. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(9), 1787-1798, 2022.
[23]UNESCO, “Las TIC accesibles y el aprendizaje personalizado para estudiantes con discapacidad”. On line:  http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002198/219827s.pdf Access: July, 2023.
[24]P., Mittler, Working towards inclusive education. London: David Fulton Publishers, 2020.
[25]M., Roma, “La accesibilidad en los entornos educativos virtuales: una revisión sistemática”. Revista Científica Arbitrada de la Fundación MenteClara, vol. 6 (219), 2021. https://doi.org/10.32351/rca.v6.219.
[26]P. L., Smith & T. J., Ragan, 2005. Instructional design. John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
[27]J., Schreffler, E., Vasquez, J., Chini & W., James, “Universal design for learning in postsecondary Stem education for students with disabilities: A systematic literature review”. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 8, 2019.
[28]M. E., Pérez & G., Chhabra, “Modelos teóricos de discapacidad: un seguimiento del desarrollo histórico del concepto de discapacidad en las últimas cinco décadas”. Revista Española de Discapacidad, 7 (I): 7-27, 2019.
[29]S. D., Barbosa, F. V., Salazar & J., Beltrán, “El modelo médico como generador de discapacidad”. Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética, 19(2), 111-122, 2019.
[30]A., Palacios, El modelo social de discapacidad: orígenes, caracterización y plasmación en la Convención Internacional sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad. Cermi. Madrid: Grupo Editorial Cinca, 2008.
[31]M., Magadán & J., Rivas, “Gamificación del aula en la enseñanza superior online: el uso de Kahoot”. Campus Virtuales: Revista Científica Iberoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, vol. 11 (1), 2022. https://doi.org/10.54988/cv.2022.1.978.
[32]B., Kitchenham & S., Charters. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report, EBSE-2007-01. Department of Computer Science, University of Durham, 2007.
[33]R., Béjar, “Hacia una educación con igualdad de oportunidades para personas con discapacidad”. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, 54(2), 148-154, 2006.
[34]I., Esquivel, Los modelos tecno-educativos, revolucionando el aprendizaje del siglo XXI. México: Editorial Lulu Digital, 2014. 
[35]L., Barrera, N., Mejía, A., Carrillo, L., Flórez & J., Pavlich, “Tukuchiy: A dynamic user interface generator to improve usability”. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 12(2), 150-176, 2016.
[36]S., Hamid, N., Admodisastro & A., Ghani, “Computer-based learning model to improve learning of the Malay language amongst dyslexic primary school students”. In Proceedings of the Asia Pacific HCI and UX Design Symposium, pp. 37-41, ACM, 2015.